jorb wrote:You can always make a "logical argument" for why any stockpile size should be extended to some, for some reason numerologically relevant higher number, but, hey if it's the numerology that is the argument, can't we just as well reduce the number of boards? I suspect OP would disagree with that, so somehow I have to doubt that the numerology really matters that much.
24 just seems impractically small. But requesting something I can do by just 'not filling the stockpile' seemed silly.
32 would work as well.
As far as 'numerology'? >.> Admittedly '5x8' was a pleasing product to my mind.