SaltyCrate wrote:How is it relevant to the current topic or, really, to any topic on this forum?
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't... It can have a huge impact on a person's world view and what they see as "standard." You were the one that said
SaltyCrate wrote:You show your mastery by being able to complete a variety of different related tasks. To not test you on all the related tasks, you are asked to complete random subset of those. Thats basicaly how all the educational tests works everywhere.
That implies your view of what is standard may not jive with what someone else has experienced in those situations, and if so, then your superlative argument would be incorrect, and that where you are from is relative to the argument you just made.
My experience with "testing" is that educational tests are good at evaluating how well one has learned the material in the classroom, and not so good at how well one will perform on an actual job. Even work performance testing and evaluation can miss nuances in a person that might be good overall, but not be something that is immediately visible on an evaluation such as "parts per hour" some jobs would get rated on normally.
Opinions expressed in this statement are the authors alone and in no way reflect on the game development values of the actual developers.