Make rage more friendly for newbies

[loleznub]

I wish they would do some of these suggestions like removing rage. I'd proceed to just make 500 alt accounts and block folks gates or palisade.

you can do it right now because almost no one buy rage in this world, where are your alts?

Why would I go through the trouble when they can just buy rage and solve the problem? I'd go through the effort if they didn't have that option. If you can't recognize that, it really only proves my point

[Qcua]

Why would I go through the trouble when they can just buy rage and solve the problem?

surely

besides that it's as simple as expand pclaim over gate entrances and your "block with alts" plan is gone. You pvpers have small brains

[Saxony4]

I'd proceed to just make 500 alt accounts and block folks gates or palisade. A world where you can't punish any type of grieving via killing/KOing said grief is simply, a griefers wet dream.

No you wouldn't and if you did the basic form of recourse would simply be to excise you from playing the game for being a shitter, if not that a simple building exclusion zone could be enforced around another person's claim to prevent boxing someone in similar to the exclusion zone on thingwalls, and you can already push people out of the way. It's not rocket science, but I guess it might as well be for the typical pvptard.

Rage shouldn't be removed, it should simply just flag you for available for pvp or not. It's that simple. Griefer being a tard? Buy rage and get rid of him, or don't and let your shit get smashed. It's a conscious choice, pvp as it stands now is almost entirely nonconsensual.

[loleznub]

Imagine thinking that I'm not placing multiple claims down to cover the all but a few tiles of the zoo enclosure. These sprucies literally have zero braincells.

Want to bash the unclaimed wall? Sure, go ahead. I'll just put alts there that prevent you from getting out or use and alt to take the wrecking ball (assuming those are even left in, as I'd consider both bashing a wall or creating siege equipment related to pvp and this also needing to be removed).

Checkmate, sprucie.

My point here, is that it's so much easier for me to grief effectively and passively when rage or pvp is not a concern for retaliation

Edit for the retard above:

If we're going to make PVP require consent, then why are we not making base raiding also need consent? It's truly sad to see the lack of braincells in you sprucies, it really is

[Qcua]

copium

u gotta stop

[Saxony4]

Imagine thinking that I'm not placing multiple claims down to cover the all but a few tiles of the zoo enclosure. These sprucies literally have zero braincells.

Want to bash the unclaimed wall? Sure, go ahead. I'll just put alts there that prevent you from getting out or use and alt to take the wrecking ball (assuming those are even left in, as I'd consider both bashing a wall or creating siege equipment related to pvp and this also needing to be removed).

Checkmate, sprucie.

My point here, is that it's so much easier for me to grief effectively and passively when rage or pvp is not a concern for retaliation

This is where the idea of removing your access to playing the game would come into fruition.

[loleznub]

I don't consent to the removal of my ability to play the game, so you can't do that.

[Saxony4]

I don't consent to the removal of my ability to play the game, so you can't do that.

Tell that to literally any other game community that has a EULA and see what the response is. Haven doesn't have one, but that doesn't mean there couldn't be one in the future.
Your consent is not needed regarding something you don't own or have any right to.

[loleznub]

copium

U gotta stop lil bro

[Rebs]

I hate everything about this thread