overtyped wrote:I think loftar is trolling. I don't believe it's actually real.
Stoneface wrote:I feel like this is a step in the right direction, and I love they are charging money! I think it(the price) may be a bit too high on everything for the time being, and I also think there should be a "permanent sub" box you could buy, to the tune of like 50 or 60 dollars, the price for a normal AAA title.
I also think you should allow for more default time, as has been stated earlier...people need a bit more time to get into the game, even 72 hours would be acceptable in my opinion. Perhaps also a little more time per month, maybe 16-20 hours?
Glad to see you finally getting paid! When I have a steady job, I will be happily supporting you guys for any price, you have truly created a wonderful game world, and you do deserve to be compensated for providing so much quality entertainment for so many people! KUDOS J & L!
overtyped wrote:LadyApollo wrote:People posting that the subscription model "solves a lot of problems" make me sick.
The game were already free, this change of model is bad to the game.
With just 48 hours new players can't get into the game and wont pay 15 dolars to a game they didn't get a chance to play at it fullest, older players are going to stop playing eventually...
I understand that the game has to be profitable so they can continue to developing it, but this is out of the line.
I'm a huge fan of the game, I spent over 30 dollars on Salem and i were happy about it.
But pay to get Playtime? No.
How am I supposed to get my friends into the game with this paywall?
I'm so upset at this that I can't even make a proper post.
I think loftar is trolling. I don't believe it's actually real.
loftar wrote:chrisrock wrote:explain p2p at least is it a joke or not
Of course it's not a joke. Believe it or not, but not even we can survive on air indefinitely.
Littleamnesia wrote:Good Value for Gamers and Botters ^^
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 7 guests