Horses to be protected by their rider's stances

[dzielny_wojownik]

lel you didnt seem 2 think it was so op when u killed arvin doing it, yet when we did it to u and u just got back on ur horse neways its suddenly 2 op NEEDS FIXED WOW. altho i agree xDDD

heh l0l what r u trying to say? that we shouldnt have did it to kill the shitter because it is OP? XDDDDDDDDDDDD

[mietzi94]

I agree on Horse armor. I also want bags for horses. Size of a small chest maybe? Maybe a bit smaller.

But i completly disagree on Not being able to knock riders of their horses. i dont even know why u complain.. You were on horses and they were on horses. They were more people. If they manage to close the distance on you and knock you off, you are either a scrublord or they just got their reward for outmoving you. Leaving the base without a horse is basically suicide atm, when you are not with a boat.
Dont see any point why you should not be able to knock riders off. Adds some diversity to the combat system.

Also if horse armor pls make them move slower with armor, so people have decide if they want to have fast horses or slower ones for battlefield.

[ChildhoodObesity]

lel you didnt seem 2 think it was so op when u killed arvin doing it, yet when we did it to u and u just got back on ur horse neways its suddenly 2 op NEEDS FIXED WOW. altho i agree xDDD

heh l0l what r u trying to say? that we shouldnt have did it to kill the shitter because it is OP? XDDDDDDDDDDDD

no im saying its weird how u only complain when it puts u at a disadvantage but when u benefited from it u didnt seem to care lol

[shubla]

Add spears.
Like big ones.
You could use them to dismount.

[Delamore]

Can some of the people for this sort of change explain to me the flow of battle you expect for person not on horse vs person on horse after this change?

Because as currently explained you feel that any fight where you're vs horses when not on horses is an instant loss, and you want to make the gap between not on horse and horse greater to solve this.

[VDZ]

Because as currently explained you feel that any fight where you're vs horses when not on horses is an instant loss, and you want to make the gap between not on horse and horse greater to solve this.

No, the problem is that horse vs horse fights quickly become horse vs non-horse fights and that there is nothing you can do about this if you're outnumbered.

[Delamore]

Because as currently explained you feel that any fight where you're vs horses when not on horses is an instant loss, and you want to make the gap between not on horse and horse greater to solve this.

No, the problem is that horse vs horse fights quickly become horse vs non-horse fights and that there is nothing you can do about this if you're outnumbered.

And the problem with horse vs non fights is ???

[ChildhoodObesity]

Because as currently explained you feel that any fight where you're vs horses when not on horses is an instant loss, and you want to make the gap between not on horse and horse greater to solve this.

No, the problem is that horse vs horse fights quickly become horse vs non-horse fights and that there is nothing you can do about this if you're outnumbered.

doesnt sound like that big of a problem tbh, i think they should be harder 2 kill tho, being protected by riders stances is definitely the dumbest way to solve it tho heuheu