Granger wrote:ChildhoodObesity wrote:maybe i dont understand whats wrong with it???
No, you don't seem to.
ChildhoodObesity wrote:Granger wrote:ChildhoodObesity wrote:maybe i dont understand whats wrong with it???
No, you don't seem to.
hey maybe you could explain why you think its bad HEHE all ive seen in this thread is ITS BAD, SLOWING IT DOWN IS GOOD! this world has been out for a year and 7 months why is it a problem that metal is so high. the current quality raising system is all pretty good imo and gives reason to actually play over a year into the game
ChildhoodObesity wrote:Granger wrote:ChildhoodObesity wrote:maybe i dont understand whats wrong with it???
No, you don't seem to.
hey maybe you could explain why you think its bad HEHE all ive seen in this thread is ITS BAD, SLOWING IT DOWN IS GOOD! this world has been out for a year and 7 months why is it a problem that metal is so high. the current quality raising system is all pretty good imo and gives reason to actually play over a year into the game
LostJustice wrote:Not to mention the highest q metal is done by 1 or 2 people
Granger wrote:+[some quotes]
Good news, as according to your argument limiting this will only cost 1-2 players.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Claude [Bot] and 1 guest