jorb wrote:Avu wrote:unwillingness
You have no respect for the time and effort involved. This is a huge project, and we are stretched as it is.
is there no one you trust to police for bots ??? someone anonymous to act as the hammer of the gods.
jorb wrote:Avu wrote:unwillingness
You have no respect for the time and effort involved. This is a huge project, and we are stretched as it is.
Granger wrote:jordancoles wrote:Characters should age and when a character reaches 60 in any stat they will begin to age quicker and after 50 irl days it should die imo
I like the direction this comment is heading, while the exact terms mentioned certainly need further thought:
Characters lifetimes being not unlimited by definition (like the human condition having a guaranteed 100% fatality rate) would give different, and most likely interesting, incentives compared to the ones we have with the current setting.
MadNomad wrote:i dont like the direction it is heading cause the ones with better developed characters will lose more than ones with worthless characters and such thing is obviously unfair
if u want to get rid of bots then find an idea which nerfs em without touching ones who dont bot
jorb wrote:Avu wrote:unwillingness
You have no respect for the time and effort involved. This is a huge project, and we are stretched as it is.
romovs wrote:Policing bots is a futile battle.
ven wrote:romovs wrote:Policing bots is a futile battle.
Yes, policing is an unending work. What isn't futile is banning alts.
ven wrote:And aging is not unfair
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Buther1956, Bytespider [Bot], Claude [Bot] and 8 guests