Some ideas from 1 window player

Thoughts on the further development of Haven & Hearth? Feel free to opine!

Re: Some ideas from 1 window player

Postby jorb » Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:09 am

ctopolon3 wrote:
jorb wrote: large thread with various, unrelated, things.

its my list what hard to endure to me, every point not need to be related each other


The Rules wrote:Please avoid making grab bag threads with multiple unrelated suggestions. Give each idea its own thread so posters can discuss its merits, so that ideas aren't overshadowed by more popular ideas, and so that they might be found later using the search tool.


The Rules
"The psychological trials of dwellers in the last times will be equal to the physical trials of the martyrs. In order to face these trials we must be living in a different world."

-- Hieromonk Seraphim Rose
User avatar
jorb
 
Posts: 18437
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:07 am
Location: Here, there and everywhere.

Re: Some ideas from 1 window player

Postby ctopolon3 » Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:26 pm

but is so comfortablу to edit it like list. mb 1 thread from 1 user on first page of "Critique & Ideas" better than 20 threads from each user?
ctopolon3
 
Posts: 488
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2015 10:22 am

Re: Some ideas from 1 window player

Postby Beezer12Washingbeard » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:05 pm

Of course it's easier for you. But you're not the one who needs to read through and parse it if you have any hope of ever seeing the suggestions put to use, are you?

The devs (of not just this game, but ANY game) are occupied with running the game itself. Game devs are also often inundated with suggestions from enthusiastic players who have all sorts of ideas--good, bad, and otherwise--of how the game could be better. Many of the suggestions (regardless of the game) are going to be repetitive, vague, or vague & repetitive, like low-detail lists of "this and this and this and this and this."

Most developers don't have the time or attention needed to try and read your mind or parse a long list of unrelated ideas and how they could fit into the existing architecture. You've seen how many threads jorb has read and replied to. The forum itself is already a big list of unrelated ideas. Make their job easier and at the very least, if you've got a big list, you could try splitting the list into a few smaller chunks of somewhat-related ideas. But ultimately if a dev asks you to make separate threads for unrelated suggestions, just fuggin do it, it costs you next to nothing and if a mod thinks you're spamming the board they'll probably let you know.
User avatar
Beezer12Washingbeard
 
Posts: 409
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Some ideas from 1 window player

Postby omocho » Wed Jan 04, 2017 6:10 pm

His suggestions are all trash anyway so it's easier if they just stay in one single thread, and die in one single thread. Lets be honest, none of this will ever happen.
omocho
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:37 am

Re: Some ideas from 1 window player

Postby Beezer12Washingbeard » Wed Jan 04, 2017 8:46 pm

Fair enough, but way I see it that's not my call to make. I mean, I had no idea wtf this could mean and thought it was more nonsense (the only part I understand is the first five words):
need alt without DA to cast_iron->bloom->cast->bloom->top_metal
mb it will be cast->bloom->wrought->steel->bloom->top_metal

But apparently jorb was able to parse it and said maybe, so what do I know.
User avatar
Beezer12Washingbeard
 
Posts: 409
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Some ideas from 1 window player

Postby ctopolon3 » Thu Jan 05, 2017 2:41 am

Beezer12Washingbeard wrote:
need alt without DA to cast_iron->bloom->cast->bloom->top_metal
mb it will be cast->bloom->wrought->steel->bloom->top_metal



its about the double/triple crit metal with alts without Deep Artifice & Metallurgy. normal player will buy all skill = cant doble/triple crit metal = have no best metal
ctopolon3
 
Posts: 488
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2015 10:22 am

Previous

Return to Critique & Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Claude [Bot] and 80 guests