Game Dev. Critique: World Pace

Thoughts on the further development of Haven & Hearth? Feel free to opine!

Re: Game Dev. Critique: World Pace

Postby ctopolon3 » Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:51 am

i love to play click\idle games. and i dont play them without autoclicker soft. some games are so balanced that there is better to go idle way instead click with autocliker. most of that kind of games just limit max clicks u can do (10cl\Sec) so autoclicker soft just gives you a slight advantage against manual clicker players...
ClickerHeroes \ RealmGrinder \ CrusadersLostIdols
ctopolon3
 
Posts: 488
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2015 10:22 am

Re: Game Dev. Critique: World Pace

Postby NOOBY93 » Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:54 am

ctopolon3 wrote:i love to play click\idle games. and i dont play them without autoclicker soft. some games are so balanced that there is better to go idle way instead click with autocliker. most of that kind of games just limit max clicks u can do (10cl\Sec) so autoclicker soft just gives you a slight advantage against manual clicker players...
ClickerHeroes \ RealmGrinder \ CrusadersLostIdols

Congrats!
Jalpha wrote:I believe in my interpretation of things.
User avatar
NOOBY93
 
Posts: 6528
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 1:12 pm

Re: Game Dev. Critique: World Pace

Postby ctopolon3 » Sat Jun 02, 2018 2:35 pm

im just tried to say that if here is no way to defeat sidesoft : make limit for that and make idle way more profitless
ctopolon3
 
Posts: 488
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2015 10:22 am

Re: Game Dev. Critique: World Pace

Postby Robben_DuMarsch » Sat Jun 02, 2018 5:53 pm

LadyGoo wrote: As the researchers discovered, people feel excited about the future shiny thingies


I believe I read this, it was the Oxford study, right?
"Future Shiny Thingies: A Comparative Review"
User avatar
Robben_DuMarsch
 
Posts: 2333
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:58 am

Previous

Return to Critique & Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Barkrowler [Bot], Claude [Bot], altacc1 and 2 guests