Substance, Food, Satiation

Thoughts on the further development of Haven & Hearth? Feel free to opine!

Re: Substance, Food, Satiation

Postby Tonkyhonk » Tue Nov 10, 2015 8:09 am

ill drop the relevant log here for those who missed the irc convo earlier.
#haven wrote:12:42 DDDsDD999 > Ess/sub for metal armour and weapons, sub/vit for food?
12:42 loftar > Nah, that hasn't really been the idea.
12:43 loftar > We just try to use all three dimensions on whatever we can fit them in a meaningful way.
12:44 loftar > I think if Essence isn't good enough on food, that might just be because the particular satiations aren't meaningful enough.
12:44 DDDsDD999 > Yeah, that's mostly it
12:44 loftar > It was the idea that they should grow to impact character development more and more as characters grow but not be too limiting early on.
12:44 loftar > But perhaps we've been too lenient still with them.
12:45 loftar > Alternatively, people just haven't reached the level where they start to matter yet.
12:45 DDDsDD999 > idk, with the super metals I feel we got steroided pretty heavily.
12:46 loftar > And yeah, the steroid metal probably doesn't help in that regard. :)
User avatar
Tonkyhonk
 
Posts: 4501
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:43 am

Re: Substance, Food, Satiation

Postby _Gunnar » Tue Nov 10, 2015 8:13 am

Avu wrote:Also can we please standarize the damn names already why is low hunger when you can eat most why did symbel say satiation instead of hunger (does it still do)? Why is satiation used for two different things? Questions.

This, please.
Image
User avatar
_Gunnar
 
Posts: 1430
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:15 pm

Previous

Return to Critique & Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests