0% Soak on Claims

[riker88]

If a player has permissions on a claim they should be able to destroy any and all structures on that claim regardless of their strength.

For example : If a player wants to tear down their own house for instance, and replace it with a Mansion they should have no problems destroying their old house.

There should be no soak value for items on a P-Claim or V-Claim in which you have vandalism permissions.

[tweinst]

You can do this with a wrecking ball.

[riker88]

well my idea is that you shouldn't need a wrecking ball on your own claim, and also I think I read that a wrecking ball requires 50 STR to operate?

[Itanu]

If you don't have 50 str, then go play the game for a few minutes until you do.

[Onep]

well my idea is that you shouldn't need a wrecking ball on your own claim, and also I think I read that a wrecking ball requires 50 STR to operate?

It does not require 50 strength. That's siegecraft and catapults.

[jorb]

Suggested many times, but it creates the strange incentive of building claims to tear things down.

[riker88]

Well you can't build a claim on land already claimed by someone else, so there should be no danger allowing someone to errect a claim to knock down some unclaimed structure. I cant see why anyone would do that though because items on unclaimed land decay by themselves, so I don't see what the downside could be.


The purpose of this would be soley for base redesign .