Enjoyment wrote:Lunarius_Haberdash wrote:However, including the quality of the wood in the quality of the final product is actually a neat idea.
Emm... why?
Actually taking fuel quality in ANY product quality is BAD idea. It is just a fuel. It can burn for longer time, may produce heater, cleaner light, but it just a source of temperature. If your iron ore sucks in quality - u shouldn't be able to smelt a fine quality steel from it, just because u lit a smelter with high-quality coal. Even if it was created from the blood of virgin-dinosaurs exactly 1 million years ago. No way. U should try harder and find good quality ore instead. And if your wife made a cake from swamp water and bone flour, it want taste good just becase u lit your oven with high-quality buxus.
So, I personally don't think thatincluding the quality of the wood in the quality of the final product is actually a neat idea.
And I think, that influence of fuel in resulting products should be removed at all. More of this - if coal q won't be taken into account for resulting product quality - people won't rebuild all their brick structures everytime they stuck +5q coal, but only if they've find +5q clay, which seems more logical for as all this fuel quailty grinding now.
Well if you're going to be picky about it, neither the fuel or kiln quality should matter for anything baked in a kiln. As long as your clay can hold together, it should produce exactly the same fired goods as a kiln made of the burned bones of virgin albino trolls mixed with clay from the enchanted holy underground shrine.
The only things where fuel quality would actually matter is wrought, where the metal trickles through the coal to gain carbon, and steel (though the coal here is separate from the fuel).