Insights for broken food insights

[Saergof]

Jorb, in your last stream you mentioned how you were surprised in general that nobody ever reported any information about broken food stuff. As example of such food you mentioned a red-shred salad. This salad is indeed among the top foods in my research list, but his good stats are derived from very, very high quality of its ingredients; I can name two other foods which gave me >30 FEPs/hunger %, if that index gives info about "brokeness" of food, but in both cases the quality of the food was very high in the first place.

Can you give us some discourse, what are the signs of non-intended food effects? What guidelines you scribed for yourself when designed FEPs, satiation rates, FEP/hunger rates, FEP kinds percentages, (fep-to-hunger)/spend effort rates or other meaningful metrics?

[Divicid]

+1, would also like to have abit of insight to this.

[jorb]

Good question, and hard to provide any hard and easy rules. If something is disproportionately easy to spam/loop/make and use relative to its gains I'd say that's busted.