Don't put maneuvers behind rage please

[nyaiee]

Bump.
I'd really like to practice combat with my friends before buying rage, and I can't really do that without the correct maneuvers. I'd do it in valhalla, but I feel like valhalla isn't the best simulation of "real" combat, for example no bunnies/rivers/knarrs/coracles/terrain variation/etc.

I'd also point out that non-rage MC fighters have no ability restrictions, whereas UA has two very big ones. I went UA because I love oak stance, but it seems like if I ever get attacked by spookybois I would've had a much better chance if I were MC to defend myself given UA's handicaps

[azrid]

agree with the post top of me
melee combat needs a newly added move behind rage

[MagicManICT]

If combat maneuvers are going to be behind skills at all, they should be their own skills no matter. Oak Stance, Combat Meditation, Bloodlust, etc.

[wonder-ass]

agree with the post top of me
melee combat needs a newly added move behind rage

it wouldnt work most mc moves have long cd you either need to be tanky or youll catch a swift death.

[pawnchito]

Seriously though, there is no point in gating moves behind rage when players with rage can kill anyone.