Realm challenge cost balancing idea

Thoughts on the further development of Haven & Hearth? Feel free to opine!

Realm challenge cost balancing idea

Postby vatas » Sat Mar 30, 2019 5:13 pm

There is currently at least slight problem where people are making "dummy" or "fake" realms that have zero bonuses and seem to exist only to block more "legitimate" realms with buffs from expanding.

My idea is basically to reduce base cost of Realm challenges with the cost increasing from every buff that Kingdom has. Preferably this would scale in a way that Realm with zero buffs could be challenged for practically free while Buffs would quickly ramp this up until it hits diminishing returns and caps at reasonable level.
Haven and Hearth Wiki (Maintained by volunteers - test/verify when practical. Forum thread

Basic Claim Safety (And what you’re doing wrong
TL:;DR: Build a Palisade with only Visitor gates.)

Combat Guide (Overview, PVE, PVP) (Includes how to escape/minimize risk of getting killed.)
User avatar
vatas
 
Posts: 4893
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 8:34 am
Location: Suomi Finland Perkele

Re: Realm challenge cost balancing idea

Postby shubla » Sat Mar 30, 2019 5:15 pm

I agree that fake realms must be addressed.
Image
I'm not sure that I have a strong argument against sketch colors - Jorb, November 2019
http://i.imgur.com/CRrirds.png?1
Join the moderated unofficial discord for the game! https://discord.gg/2TAbGj2
Purus Pasta, The Best Client
User avatar
shubla
 
Posts: 13041
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 11:26 am
Location: Finland

Re: Realm challenge cost balancing idea

Postby stya » Sat Mar 30, 2019 5:18 pm

The challenge auth cost isn't the biggest issue, the problem is the extra manpower and time to challenge, bash, replace the cairn and then defend the new fresh one.

This is by far the biggest cost of border conficts.
Image
User avatar
stya
 
Posts: 993
Joined: Wed May 21, 2014 3:13 pm

Re: Realm challenge cost balancing idea

Postby Kaios » Sat Mar 30, 2019 5:22 pm

vatas wrote:My idea is basically to reduce base cost of Realm challenges with the cost increasing from every buff that Kingdom has. Preferably this would scale in a way that Realm with zero buffs could be challenged for practically free while Buffs would quickly ramp this up until it hits diminishing returns and caps at reasonable level.


Huh?? So small village sets up realm and is basically free to be destroyed if it takes them too long to get buffs up which it most certainly will. I don't think most players realize the amount of time and effort that goes in to creating realm buffs, sure looks real easy when a couple of realms can just claim over some crap and throw out good buffs like their nothing though so it's hard to blame people for feeling that way I guess.
User avatar
Kaios
 
Posts: 9176
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:14 am

Re: Realm challenge cost balancing idea

Postby Headchef » Sat Mar 30, 2019 7:17 pm

''Fake'' realm is to send more challenges to pussy realms who raise cost of making said challenges :roll:
User avatar
Headchef
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:27 pm

Re: Realm challenge cost balancing idea

Postby Sethfire » Sat Mar 30, 2019 7:27 pm

For the record, such a realm does exist. The MOTHERLAND realm was set up by AD and NN to contest Hedgehugs over control of the South Continent. It has absolutely no buffs and will never get any, and I feel bad for the people living there.

However, now that Seamarks were added, this won't be a continuing issue, I believe NN is trying to slowly assimilate MOTHERLAND territory right now.

Image
Sethfire
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 5:45 pm

Re: Realm challenge cost balancing idea

Postby Ants » Sat Mar 30, 2019 10:52 pm

stya wrote:The challenge auth cost isn't the biggest issue, the problem is the extra manpower and time to challenge, bash, replace the cairn and then defend the new fresh one.

This is by far the biggest cost of border conficts.

Cairn palisades are the biggest issue, I think. It wouldn't be so complicated and boring if making cairns inaccessible wasn't a legit tactic.
Haven's most kawaii retarded ethot karen
Image
User avatar
Ants
 
Posts: 1842
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 9:55 pm
Location: inside your head

Re: Realm challenge cost balancing idea

Postby Hasta » Sun Mar 31, 2019 1:24 am

Sethfire wrote:It has absolutely no buffs and will never get any, and I feel bad for the people living there.

Aww thanks, we all feel warm and fuzzy now, safely hiding behind scattered hermit palisades ('cause we're being killed on sight), watching our quest list thin out and fade due to questgivers' demise, sipping hot cocoa and reading constant cyrillic Realm chat interrupted by occasional #filthyrussians hashtag. That one in particular brings a tear of joy to my eye.

Jokes aside,
shubla wrote:I agree that fake realms must be addressed.


This is marginally the thread for it though.
User avatar
Hasta
 
Posts: 1937
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2014 3:27 pm

Re: Realm challenge cost balancing idea

Postby MagicManICT » Sun Mar 31, 2019 4:11 am

Sethfire wrote:For the record, such a realm does exist. The MOTHERLAND realm was set up by AD and NN to contest Hedgehugs over control of the South Continent. It has absolutely no buffs and will never get any, and I feel bad for the people living there.

However, now that Seamarks were added, this won't be a continuing issue, I believe NN is trying to slowly assimilate MOTHERLAND territory right now.

The flipside to this is that AD has been dropping border cairns along the coast as fast as they can to prevent HH from sticking seamarks right off the coast of the western continent.

I guess all hail the new overlord? At least we get the bonuses.

And as I understand it, doesn't a realm have to cover certain things to even erect any of the bonus authority objects? If a realm is challenging authority, it may take some time to be able to accomplish this. I'm not saying Motherland wasn't a dummy realm with the sole purpose of challenging someone else's realm authority and no intention of providing any benefit to the dwellers, but that just assuming so about any new realm is in bad form. I'm not against this idea, but it doesn't seem well balanced as is.
Opinions expressed in this statement are the authors alone and in no way reflect on the game development values of the actual developers.
User avatar
MagicManICT
 
Posts: 18435
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:47 am

Re: Realm challenge cost balancing idea

Postby MightySheep » Sun Mar 31, 2019 4:14 am

im pretty sure those realms wouldnt exist if seamarks were added sooner tho

so its not rly an issue going forward
User avatar
MightySheep
 
Posts: 2165
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 1:18 pm

Next

Return to Critique & Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Yandex [Bot] and 0 guests