MagicManICT wrote:Not sure it's all that much different. Same ideas are getting repeated in response as is typical.
The reasoning in most threads before was "it is too expensive to build" while mine is "it is illogical to destruct such monumental structure". Seems pretty different to me.
MagicManICT wrote:Just making them cheaper would be a reasonable request, too, I think.
No, it would solve nothing, if vandals can bash them constantly (like now). And the problem for me personally (though I think im not the only one with it) is not the cost itself rather then amount of time and energy consumed with addition to tedium in construction anything on coast (due to the fact you can't place much stockpiles with resourses)
MagicManICT wrote:I also think shubla is a bit right in that with the need of siege weaopns, it'd be too easy to block some of the rivers with just a single dock.
Again, I don't think that making in handbashable was a good solution to solve OTHER pretty unrelated issues. If it is destructible only for the inability to block rivers - then we need another solution for that, because this one is bad.
MagicManICT wrote:Maybe a complete redesign is necessary. Design the dock so the ship pulls up next to the bank, with a built up area that can a ship can tie to. Downside will be you can only dock one boat at a time instead of two. Upside is it blocks very few rivers (most likely ones a knarr can barely fit through, anyway), and can be used in rivers the other dock couldn't.
Or we can limit knarrdocks to one-per vclaim. with addition of ability to tie ships on shore (so we can hide snekjas in safe pali)