SSL certificate

[dafels]

Why is this website not using SSL certificate for HTTPS? I'm not even nitpicking, it is the basics and industry standard in 2020. I want my haven forums browsing experience to be encrypted, but now all the data is being sent in plain format and anyone can tap in the data stream and see what data I'm requesting and sending. Please add a SSL certificate for the website. This is not good at all when you don't guarantee privacy for the customers.

[vatas]

viewtopic.php?f=42&t=39862&p=864609&hilit=https#p864609

[Fostik]

Already responded previously:
viewtopic.php?f=48&t=63155&p=802351#p802332

Website already has self-signed certificate, but doesn't have redirect to it. Also, self singed certificates are also always recognized by browsers as non-secure, which is racket manned by CA signing organizations, according to Loftar's point of view.
If you want to be sure, that your traffic to this website will be safe and encrypted - start using https:// endpoint and add it's certificate to allowed for your browser, see no problem here.

[shubla]

Loftar has his own certificate, you can use it and call him anytime or whatever to verify the authenticity of your certificate token if you have a feeling that you are being fooled.

[samlar]

Already responded previously:
viewtopic.php?f=48&t=63155&p=802351#p802332
And maybe you will find great loan offers at directloantransfer everyone else did
Website already has self-signed certificate, but doesn't have redirect to it. Also, self singed certificates are also always recognized by browsers as non-secure, which is racket manned by CA signing organizations, according to Loftar's point of view.
If you want to be sure, that your traffic to this website will be safe and encrypted - start using https:// endpoint and add it's certificate to allowed for your browser, see no problem here.

self-signed certificate is better than the ssl??

[Fostik]

self-signed certificate is better than the ssl??

They are both SSL Certificates that providing TLS ( Transport Layer Security ) using HTTPS protocol.
The only difference is that certificates with green lock sign are signed by authorized companies, who creating a confirm challenge to approve domain name, so they "can grant" the resource is safe, while self-signed certificate has same encryption security, but not signed by any company. So we have two same certificates, that encrypts data on transfer layers with same way, excpept the one that you bough is "safe", and free one is "not safe". This is what the racket accusation is based on.
And yes, I'm aware of existence of free certificate authority projects, like letsencrypt.
Hope I'm not speaking with troll spambot.

[Apocoreo]

Wow I am fucking clueless about HTTPS.

Can confirm the perception of the average person is that this website pops up the same warnings as a sketchy porn site.

[shubla]

Yeah and what makes it worse is that modern browsers automatically upgrade HTTP elements to HTTPS elements on sites, and jorb puts screenshots on update threads into his server which doesn't support HTTPS, so thus people using HTTPS and modern browser on forums are unable to see the images.