
OPEN SOURCE THE LEGACY CODEBASE AND MY LIFE IS YOURS!!!
terechgracz wrote:Roben, since you're deep into philosophy and John Locke, help me out here. What's your core statement, something that can be????
- logically analyzed
- or
- empirically tested
With this given provide complete proof of this statement. I'll then either support your case or debunk it in quest for ULTIMATE TRUTH.
ChatGPT wrote:John Locke's idea of probable reasoning is a way of thinking and making decisions when we’re not 100% sure about something. He said that since we can’t always know everything for certain, we often have to make the best guess based on what we know.
- Learning from Experience: Think about the last time you tried a new food. If you liked it, you might guess that other similar foods will taste good, too. Locke said that we learn from our experiences and use them to guess what will happen in the future. The more something has happened to us, the more we believe it’s likely to happen again.
- Listening to Others: Imagine your friend tells you about a fun new game. Even if you haven’t played it, you might believe them because you trust your friend. Locke said we also use what other people tell us to help us decide if something is probably true.
- Making Decisions When We're Not Sure: Sometimes, we don’t have all the information we need, but we still have to make a decision. Locke believed that even though we don’t always have perfect information, we can use what we do know to make the best guess we can.
In short, Locke’s probable reasoning is about using what we’ve learned and what others have told us to make smart guesses when we don’t know for sure what will happen.
terechgracz wrote:you coward
stop using dead philosopher as shield to avoid actual debate
clarify your position and PROVE it or perish forever
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Dotbot [Bot] and 115 guests