make tsacks equippable in the hand pouch slots

[Nightdawg]

I have no argument to defend this suggestion, idk if it's bad

[Sevenless]

That'll let me hold so many more chugjugs of water in my inventory! Outside of the pvp implication, for everything else that'd basically just be less of a hassle and would be a nice upgrade.

I don't know if I care whether or not pvpers are allowed to have inventory. More water and snacks for even longer chases?

[Reiber]

would solve a lot of issues with two handed tools. for jobs you would really like sacks for.
like harvesting grapes with a scyte or digging with a high q shovel.

prop is the only thing that out powerscales the hip jugs though.

and creels and quivers are already pushed off of the slot. by those.

would make always having sacks on you a 100% nobrainer though, and basically turn the slot intoo an mandatory tsack slot. with only inferior options.

[Archiplex]

this would make those slots basically permanently reserved for tsacks and there would never be a point in using them for anything else except them, minus maybe creels since you cant keep one in your inv if it has stuff inside but EITHER WAYS because stacks dont work in creels...

like, why would you EVER put anything except tsacks into them?

[vatas]

like, why would you EVER put anything except tsacks into them?

[Oldimaru]

like, why would you EVER put anything except tsacks into them?

Miner > purse for gems
Fisher or crab hunter or pearl diver > creels
Forager/hunter > tracks
Mb some farmers wants a seed bags but we haven't it

[Valgar]

like, why would you EVER put anything except tsacks into them?

Miner > purse for gems
Fisher or crab hunter or pearl diver > creels
Forager/hunter > tracks
Mb some farmers wants a seed bags but we haven't it

Forager got the Straw Basket
Farmer got the Seed Pouch

Belt Slots are already great (you can store Glass bottles)
By allowing Traveller sacks it could be a bit overpowered, or this should hinder the movement speed.

[Reiber]

Miner > purse for gems = worse than 2 sacks
Fisher or crab hunter or pearl diver > creels = you can carry 25% of the mussles/fish that fit in 2 sacks into 2 creels
Forager/hunter > same as with creels. but worse, even. 1 sack holds more blueberrys than 2 wickerpickers. and it wouldnt require handslots.

sacks actually scale with other inventory increases. making it only worse with mrobes, subscriptions, and nomad counted in.

also. jugs already made any other pouch items unviable again, and tsacks on hip would allow you to carry 4 more jugs,

[Nightdawg]

ah, I figured people would still use everything else till they get tsacks
and thought creels are still better when you go fishing since they give more slots for lures, or pouches for mining gems

[maze]

god no; the hip slot already feels like it was a cool idea instantly made the dumbest feature upgrade.

There should have been a few things ever allowed in the hip slot; water was not one of them, it forced the meta game onto it. Adding inventory to it just makes it further annoying to have to mid/max.
it legit went from "cool a slot that does not really matter and I can throw odd junk like keys, lantern onto" to "O OH OH to be a pvp god MORE WATER kek".

They need to rollback on that water feature, it's just as bad as every player needing to wear bunny slippers incase of pvp. now it's added need to wear water jugs incase of pvp.