Stack transfer inconsistency is beyond retarded

Thoughts on the further development of Haven & Hearth? Feel free to opine!

Stack transfer inconsistency is beyond retarded

Postby Nightdawg » Sat Jan 24, 2026 8:48 pm





Shift + LClick unstacked item in a Container, when Container has unfilled stacks and Inventory has no stacks = Transfers unstacked item to Inventory:
Image

Shift + LClick unstacked item in Inventory, when Container has unfilled stacks and Inventory has no stacks = Transfer unstacked item into Container stack:
Image

Shift + LClick unstacked item in Container, when Inventory has unfilled stacks and Container has unfilled stacks = Transfer unstacked item into Inventory:
Image

Shift + LClick unstacked item in Inventory, when Container has unfilled stacks and Inventory has unfilled stacks = Transfer unstacked item into Inventory stack:
Image


Jesus christ
User avatar
Nightdawg
 
Posts: 2419
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2020 12:31 am

Re: Stack transfer inconsistency is beyond retarded

Postby Jorg » Sun Jan 25, 2026 6:21 pm

I just use list inventory view and stack everything after
Jorg
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 6:05 am

Re: Stack transfer inconsistency is beyond retarded

Postby Dawidio123 » Mon Jan 26, 2026 4:50 pm

Dw just another 10 bandaids and stacks will be good. Surely barters will be able to handle them any time now.
Ingame: Shaki
      Image
      Image
JOIN THE OFFICIAL H&H DISCORD TODAY
User avatar
Dawidio123
 
Posts: 1386
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:48 pm
Location: In your ear

Re: Stack transfer inconsistency is beyond retarded

Postby Luno » Tue Jan 27, 2026 10:45 pm

I remember being really happy when bundles were added(and then turned into stacks, which are better).
But in hindsight i think it made inventory expansions less valuable and handling stacks can be very annoying.
I kinda miss not being able to fit an entire forest worth of forageables in my pockets.
User avatar
Luno
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2022 3:10 pm

Re: Stack transfer inconsistency is beyond retarded

Postby jorb » Thu Jan 29, 2026 8:22 pm

You're not wrong. May try to look at some of this again.
"The psychological trials of dwellers in the last times will be equal to the physical trials of the martyrs. In order to face these trials we must be living in a different world."

-- Hieromonk Seraphim Rose
User avatar
jorb
 
Posts: 18553
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:07 am
Location: Here, there and everywhere.

Re: Stack transfer inconsistency is beyond retarded

Postby Audiosmurf » Thu Jan 29, 2026 8:34 pm

Luno wrote:I kinda miss not being able to fit an entire forest worth of forageables in my pockets.

Definitely agree. I've had the idea that they should try to invert the current paradigm of stacking not working in sub-inventories, like creels and wicker pickers, and make it so stacking ONLY works in locations like that.
jorb wrote:Audiosmurf isisis a fantastic poster/geniusracist and hisa meat/intellect is hugehomosexual
User avatar
Audiosmurf
 
Posts: 2689
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:00 pm
Location: Ice Hell

Re: Stack transfer inconsistency is beyond retarded

Postby FaithfulToadd » Thu Jan 29, 2026 9:42 pm

Audiosmurf wrote:
Luno wrote:I kinda miss not being able to fit an entire forest worth of forageables in my pockets.

Definitely agree. I've had the idea that they should try to invert the current paradigm of stacking not working in sub-inventories, like creels and wicker pickers, and make it so stacking ONLY works in locations like that.

This sounds interesting! I'd like stacks in cupboards to stay, though.
Howdy!
User avatar
FaithfulToadd
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2026 11:22 pm
Location: Texas, USA


Return to Critique & Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Dotbot [Bot], Dreesck and 16 guests