Robben_DuMarsch wrote:It's all good man.
Dawidio123 wrote:Bob didn't say that.
jorb wrote:Audiosmurf isis a fantastic poster/genius and his meatintellect is huge
banok wrote:i've been playing hnh thru 10 years of involuntary celibacy and I always build my palisade in 5 minutes so if a new player cant figure it out straight away they can get fucked and chug bleach
Robben_DuMarsch wrote:Dawidio123 wrote:Bob didn't say that.
Only he literally didn't say that. It's just a fair interpretation of what he said. But you're asking for a lot for Bob to understand that.
He couldn't even figure out in the other thread how logging in hidden worked. If someone had spelled it out clearly he would have understood, but you guys were just alluding to it. Bob is very intelligent in other ways, but understanding the nuances of conversation and inference aren't one of those ways.
Audiosmurf wrote:The way you're talking about him like he's some geek show on a chain is really really really funny
Nightdawg wrote:Surely nightdawg must be a scumbag liar, as always
overtyped wrote:Nightdawg wrote:Surely nightdawg must be a scumbag liar, as always
This is fucking absurd.
If I thought you were the cause of the exploit, I wouldn't have used that client. because if I thought you were someone who would add exploits into a client, I would immediately change my password and never use that client again, for fear my account was stolen, and guess what? My password is still the same. I still don't think that.
Who the fuck would automatically assume that asking, if theres a possibilty of an exploit automatically assumes the creater put that exploit in. That's like saying, "oh, world of warcraft has a bug, therefore the creators must have wanted that bug in there.
Also, if I thought nightdawg was responsible, I wouldn't have fucking asked him about it. I was hoping that maybe he could have looked into it somehow. I don't know, i'm not a fucking coder, and I don't know how they fix these things. I wanted to report a issue I found, in hopes it was fixed. That's how bugs get fixed, don't they?
I have made it very clear that I respect people who put their time and energy into making clients for plebs like us. I would never assume that the creator of a client I use is responsible for fucking anything.
mulamishne wrote:overtyped wrote:Nightdawg wrote:Surely nightdawg must be a scumbag liar, as always
This is fucking absurd.
If I thought you were the cause of the exploit, I wouldn't have used that client. because if I thought you were someone who would add exploits into a client, I would immediately change my password and never use that client again, for fear my account was stolen, and guess what? My password is still the same. I still don't think that.
Who the fuck would automatically assume that asking, if theres a possibilty of an exploit automatically assumes the creater put that exploit in. That's like saying, "oh, world of warcraft has a bug, therefore the creators must have wanted that bug in there.
Also, if I thought nightdawg was responsible, I wouldn't have fucking asked him about it. I was hoping that maybe he could have looked into it somehow. I don't know, i'm not a fucking coder, and I don't know how they fix these things. I wanted to report a issue I found, in hopes it was fixed. That's how bugs get fixed, don't they?
I have made it very clear that I respect people who put their time and energy into making clients for plebs like us. I would never assume that the creator of a client I use is responsible for fucking anything.
No offense Bob, but did Robben write this for you?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 105 guests