-
Slaya15
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:51 pm
- Location: USA. Arkansas.
Inactivity - unstakes land.
If you don't log in for 30 or 60 days, your claim should be unstaked to give new players a chance at claiming mines and the like.
Every battle fought has been decided before the first blow ever landed.
-
Phaen
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:17 am
Re: Inactivity - unstakes land.
Currently in the game:
If a village claim overlaps a personal claim stake, the Lawspeaker can remove the Stake Claim at a cost of 250 authority per tile.
However,
I agree with your suggestion.
If a village claim overlaps a personal claim stake, the Lawspeaker can remove the Stake Claim at a cost of 250 authority per tile.
However,
I agree with your suggestion.

-
Leny-m
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 8:04 pm
-
painhertz
- Posts: 6185
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:07 am
- Website: Http://www.noneyafuckinbusyness.com
- Yahoo Messenger: chaosovum
- Location: Louisiana
Re: Inactivity - unstakes land.
he wasn't talking jokingly. The next iteration of the game will more than likely have claim upkeep of some form or other.
"I shall PERSONALLY witness for you at the shiny, chrome gates of Valhalla!"
-
sabinati
- Posts: 15527
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
- Location: View active topics
Re: Inactivity - unstakes land.
painhertz wrote:he wasn't talking jokingly. The next iteration of the game will more than likely have claim upkeep of some form or other.
-
Slaya15
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:51 pm
- Location: USA. Arkansas.
Re: Inactivity - unstakes land.
I think that claim upkeep is not necessary if you just have peoples stakes unclaimed after not logging in for 30 days or so. By 30 days they are definately inactive and not likely to return.
Every battle fought has been decided before the first blow ever landed.
-
painhertz
- Posts: 6185
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:07 am
- Website: Http://www.noneyafuckinbusyness.com
- Yahoo Messenger: chaosovum
- Location: Louisiana
Re: Inactivity - unstakes land.
Wrong. sometimes another game catches my eye and I'll play it that long without logging in. no, upkeep is def the way to go.Slaya15 wrote:I think that claim upkeep is not necessary if you just have peoples stakes unclaimed after not logging in for 30 days or so. By 30 days they are definately inactive and not likely to return.
"I shall PERSONALLY witness for you at the shiny, chrome gates of Valhalla!"
-
Slaya15
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:51 pm
- Location: USA. Arkansas.
Re: Inactivity - unstakes land.
I said not likely, after 30 days. Most games like on console or single player computer you can beat in far under 30 days. Most other MMO's you may just out-right quit for. If not, just log back in every 29 days so you don't lose it all.
Every battle fought has been decided before the first blow ever landed.
-
bmjclark
- Posts: 4053
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 6:40 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Inactivity - unstakes land.
Upkeep is far better so we don't have as many alt claims everywhere.
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
-
Slaya15
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:51 pm
- Location: USA. Arkansas.
Re: Inactivity - unstakes land.
Yeah but then all you gotta do is spend a little amount of time on your alts to keep your claims. Same game, different rules. This thread is also primarily about inactive people who have quit but have claimed valuable resources.
Every battle fought has been decided before the first blow ever landed.
