Inactive player->inactive hearthfire

[warrri]

Since wilderness spawning was implemented i see more and more hearthfires on my route, which lower the animal level (DO NOT WANT). As we know the game is still, and wilderness spawning does by no mean make it better, very noobunfriendly. So most of these newbies play for one day, but their hearth fire lowers the animal level forever/until someone leaves theft scents...

Quick solution to this would be making hearthfires from chars that are inactive, as in didnt login for a week or so, not lower the animal level anymore. They should however maintain all of their functions and start to spread civ as soon as the char becomes active again(if it ever does..)

[Nemu]

yes please

[kimya]

thats a good idea, and i would even do the same with everything that spreads civ... like cabins or at least villages...
the idea of those levels is that civlisation repels nature, but why would some cabins or even abandoned villages hold off nature from taking back what belongs to her?

[Gauteamus]

Maybe this could be combined with the "You have to visit your hearth regularly or suffer debuff" suggestion that has come up before?

[Delamore]

Maybe this could be combined with the "You have to visit your hearth regularly or suffer debuff" suggestion that has come up before?

Or it could just be added as it is because it's simple, solves a problem without bringing up more.
Oh and it's not completely shit like the debuff suggestion, how bout that.

[Jackard]

Maybe this could be combined with the "You have to visit your hearth regularly or suffer debuff" suggestion that has come up before?

yea maybe it could if they wanted to combine reasonable suggestions with really stupid ones

[jorb]

Hearth fires shouldn't give civ at all imho.

[Jackard]

thatd be nice

[sabinati]

Hearth fires shouldn't give civ at all imho.

make it so

[Seizure]

Hearth fires shouldn't give civ at all imho.

Why do they then? Quite odd IMO.