LadyV wrote:I'd rather have good additions not easy ones.
Lord_of_War wrote:LadyV wrote:I'd rather have good additions not easy ones.
Ofc we all would. But sometimes you have to limit yourself to things that are easy so something actually happens see. If you ask for something major it will take a long time and be hard and have a low likelihood of being implemented. However if it is easy it might actually happen.
LadyV wrote:Lord_of_War wrote:LadyV wrote:I'd rather have good additions not easy ones.
Ofc we all would. But sometimes you have to limit yourself to things that are easy so something actually happens see. If you ask for something major it will take a long time and be hard and have a low likelihood of being implemented. However if it is easy it might actually happen.
I'm sorry but I guess we come from two different worlds. I believe if your going to do something do it right. Society has already breed a generation on accepting half finished junk. I will not add to it. If they plan to add it I hope they do it well and not take shortcuts.
Lord_of_War wrote:I completely agree. But you don't understand the point is to have something at the end of the day.
Lord_of_War wrote:Matter of preference. Maybe you aren't desperate enough lol.
LadyV wrote:Lord_of_War wrote:Matter of preference. Maybe you aren't desperate enough lol.
It's a game in a world full of them. How can you be desperate? That's just silly.
AnnaC wrote:I can see this, but I'd rather see things like Wagons not going full speed through them, nor animals. I know hearthlings have some easy advantages with animals, but what about the advantage animals have crossing any terrain and not having stamina or anything like that?
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 2 guests