Since when do the devs do resurections on request?

by **Onionfighter** » Mon Sep 13, 2010 6:24 am

I could see reviving a character who's account had been compromised. But I don't see how it could be proved that what they had claimed was true.

Anyway it seems rage can still provide q600 drama.

by **Jackard** » Mon Sep 13, 2010 6:41 am

yeas we havent had one of these bitchfests in a while well done all. the tears of avu were especially delicious

by **Avu** » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:42 am

As long as I can make the goons happy I am happy. Did I make you all happy with this thread?

by **SinJin** » Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:06 am

Avu wrote:As long as I can make the goons happy I am happy. Did I make you all happy with this thread?

Happy about whut ? An ally lost an argument and therefore lost his character. Chalk it up and move on cause it aint nothin but a thing.

This only pales in comparison to how frustrating it is to see Sodom was allowed to exist after the mass abuse of the bandage bug that allowed a village to become a powerful monstrosity so early in the game.

This changes nothing and I still think you're a bitch. I'm sure that makes you happy... bitch

by **Onionfighter** » Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:09 am

Really, how did the bandage bug help them so much? I don't get that.

by **burgingham** » Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:13 am

SinJin wrote:This only pales in comparison to how frustrating it is to see Sodom was allowed to exist after the mass abuse of the bandage bug that allowed a village to become a powerful monstrosity so early in the game.

I do not want to derail this thread into a Sodom bug-abuse discussion (open another thread if you want to further discuss that), but that is bullshit and you know it. We didn't become who we are over some 10k lp macroed by only a few villagers with that bug. Lots of factions used the same macro at that time, the bandages only helped a little and we reported them in quite fast.

Oh also, we lost people over that bug btw. Probably more lp gone than earned in the end.

by **Blacktooth** » Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:22 am

Ok, so this is a new precedent set.

I fully expect that the next time someone's account is compromised that the perpetrator loses his characters as well.

by **WarpedWiseMan** » Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:30 am

He did.

by **Blacktooth** » Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:43 am

WarpedWiseMan wrote:He did.

Reading comprehension is worth looking into.

by **DatOneGuy** » Mon Sep 13, 2010 9:21 am

Blacktooth wrote:Ok, so this is a new precedent set.

Oh u

Since when do the devs do resurections on request?

Re: Since when do the devs do resurections on request?

Re: Since when do the devs do resurections on request?

Re: Since when do the devs do resurections on request?

Re: Since when do the devs do resurections on request?

Re: Since when do the devs do resurections on request?

Re: Since when do the devs do resurections on request?

Re: Since when do the devs do resurections on request?

Re: Since when do the devs do resurections on request?

Re: Since when do the devs do resurections on request?

Re: Since when do the devs do resurections on request?

Who is online