Jackard wrote:Email or PM the devs if you don't want any replies from the forum. Otherwise find some way to cope.
Stuffs like horses are minor changes.
Could have a significant impact on combat
I saw devs are reading this topic, so I writted here.
But you are right that I can not prohibit replys on my posts. You can write anything you want. I just want everybody to know that I'm not interested in verbal skirmishes.
You have a point about combat. However, I still think that changes like this will not change a number of active players. Changes like making combat much easier/harder could do it. For me, HnH is already good in most, but needs more players and mayby some balance between groups like old vs new characters or moders vs people using commonly known mods.
overtyped wrote:raziel_horus wrote:painhertz wrote:
I'm just interested in discussing about the game, not about someone's opinion.
Let me get this straight, you want to discuss the game, but don't want opinions.
Which brings me to this
raziel_horus wrote:Noone gives a fuck about your personal feelings
You realize when you posted your ideas about the game, those are your personal opinions. I dislike name calling, but the word halfwit suits you too well.
Discussing the game and discussing someone's taste are two different things. Everybody has one's own taste. It's obvious that there are people who likes some idea and people who dislikes it. Mayby I should have used the word "taste" from the beginning. I wrote some opinions about the game, but I gave arguments for the usefulness of my ideas. Taste doesn't need arguments. So you can't rationally discusse it. Jackard says that horses are important, because they are changing combat. That is an example of talking about the game.