by bentalbot » Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:05 am
Warning: This post is going to turn into a mish-mash of ideas.
What about the relationship between a thief's exploration and stealth? Honestly I'm not too sure on how it is currently, but can a thief always see where he's leaving scent markings behind? I'd imagine it's broken now anyway because you don't need high exploration at all to be able to find scents. The way I see it, if a thief has terrible exploration he shouldn't be able to tell where he's leaving clues behind. And inversely, if he has equal or better exploration and can tell where he's left his mark, it should be tamperable to make it harder to follow (ala wiping down fingerprints.) Currently, if you leave a scent then you're just shit out of luck as far as removing it goes, which is pretty backwards when you're staring right at the evidence.
Although that said the thief would then only need to have their stats level at 1/1 to be able to tamper with the clues. Perhaps there could be a minimum stealth skill value for being able to tamper with each crime, so say tresspassing could be 10, theft 50, assault 100, whatever. Or maybe just make the degree to which the clues are thrown off be a facet of the stealth skill, so someone with a skill of 10 would barely be able to damage the tresspassing scents where as someone with 100 could completely remove the trail.
Yes, this would give the thieves an option to completely avoid detection and get away scot free, but that would be at the cost of them having to dump even more LP into their exploration/stealth than they currently have to anyway.
I don't know how easy it would be to implement, but if possible then a crime that has been tampered with could borrow from the idea of the radar wedge growing bigger at lower skill levels. A completely fresh, untouched scent could have the current fairly precise radar blip that shows their direction, where as one that has been almost completely removed would give almost a 180 degree chunk. It's still followable, sure, but you're going to have a much harder time if you don't have a completely perfect clue.
Or hell, just break up the kinds of clues that are left behind. Make distinctions between footprints, which would show the ranger the direction that the person headed off in and clothing or hair samples to check whether a suspect was the perpetrator. I know what I'd really like is if the tracking was more of an actual trail as opposed to just a radar beacon, so basically you'd have a trail of smoke like that rises from the current scents just leading in a path where the thief walked. It could be stronger in forest area where the thief is breaking branches and stepping in mud, and almost completely gone when they are on a paved road. Maybe keep the current scents as a way of refreshing your trail if you lose it, similar to how a bloodhound needs to be reminded of the scent if it drops it. I suppose this would lend itself more to an actual progression of actions than just a straight shot to the person's hearthfire. I don't really know why you'd be able to go straight to someone's hearth from the scene of a crime, and not have to follow their actual movements first.