theTrav wrote:Everything else aside, current trend is for people to WANT to move out of civilization.
...
Do you want to encourage players to live together or apart?
If you want them to live together, then you have to make them NOT WANT to go to mordor 90% of the time. This means making it by and large a painful place to be in, while making populated areas, by and large, fun/pleasant places to be in.
This. Now, granted, Permadeath can have this effect. I recently had problems with a village who wanted to set up his own spot way the fuck out in the middle of no where. He wanted to take bricks I spent a lot of time making and hauling from goonclay so he could have ovens for his own farms among other things that I was generally insulted by the notion that he thought I was stupid enough to support leech.
His best argument was something along the lines of "Oh, yeah, lets develop and kill civ values even more than they are already fucked sky high." My opinion is that he can set up a 'hunting hearth' to get away from civ values and take chests in boats (or chest+grinder) like I do. The current motivation for people to band together adn work together is the achievement of increased productivity by having communal access to specialized resources. AS such I told him to gtfo and gave orders to KoS if he was spotted in the village vicinity after he proved to be quite obstinate and I had support from the majority of my villagers.
The reward for living in high Civ areas is purely player based and established. Civ values are curse rather than a blessing to all but the newbiest towns.
If dev's want to encourage mob killing as the main mode of play, then sure, but not just because that's how people have decided to start playing in the alpha.
This...but...
I think the argument of "I've invested a lot of time and effort grinding animal killing so you should make sure killing hard animals continues to reward me for that effort" is a particularly strong one.
To be fair, this is not his argument but rather his motivation for making the arguments he does.
[/quote]
Spiff wrote:Chakravanti wrote:eql wrote:what. ofcourse you can. not the be all and end all.
You're a dumbass.
Because you definitely can't debate any decisions that two random guys in sweden made EVER. It's a good thing they never passed judgment on civil rights either, because we couldn't debate any of those things either.
I thin I've more than shown my ability for reading comprehension, critical analysis and creative response. I do not however, respond to people who take me out of context, show a lack of understanding of a conversation that has already been had, discussed, and moved past.
People who are obviously stupid are fun and
easy to troll. Nice try.

You could take a few pointers from the J-Bomb.