DatOneGuy wrote:1)Gato has interest in lying that he stole Rage's account. Why? Personal reasons.
DatOneGuy wrote:2)This isn't a glitch it's a security problem, not the game's security problem. Rage's security problem. Gato didn't 'hack his email' as I'm sure you guys very well overplayed to make it seem as if it were as you said that "Gato exploited that 'Password resets never expire' and used and 'forwarded' the email to a throwaway account."
DatOneGuy wrote:3)Gato has personal reasons to want to have Rage stay.
a]Let your sister leave and live with this guy, while she's pregnant. (Yeah, sure, that's a great idea)
b]Lie and let the stupid bum get his account back so that instead of disappearing for 2 days like he did and ending up drunk in a sewer or in the papers for jumping off a 6 story building and only being mildly injured, the child is actually safe.
DatOneGuy wrote:4)Gato has access to Rage's account directly via PC, what reason would he have for such convoluted means?
DatOneGuy wrote:5)Personal security stupidity is going to be rewarded now? Yeah sorry but that's ridiculous, no this isn't a 'GM' problem because this isn't a 'Game' problem, it's a personal security problem, to a personal problem. There's obvious tension between the two if it came to this, and this security 'problem' is more provable because anyone could have hopped on that computer, so likewise I guess I'll just force my 6yo brother to play this game so that one day if I die I'll say that he stole my computer and went killing people. All I'd have to do is have him confess after all.
DatOneGuy wrote:These are all problems that have to deal with personal bullshit. They in no way are related to the game.
I've never said that loftar is foolish in decisions at all, and I'm not implying that. However I am stating that he was lied to, and furthermore you sabinati, and Spiff both know this. The proof is all over IRC chatlogs, and I made a big stink so no, now none of you can deny what happened or what was said, there were more than enough people there to prove me right.
DatOneGuy wrote:This is an extremely slippery slope, whether it's called a one-time thing or not it's ridiculous. Not from the point of "I'm not a goon and I hate goons so I want them to die blabhablahblah" because that's stupid. This is a bad thing from the point of view that if I can 'prove' external means which the game cannot track I can easily lie about what happened, Gato could have just as easily taken the character and made a false raid on Sodom as a 'concealed suicide'. Then what?
There's no real safety or meaning in killing someone at all if there is always the chance of some bullshit ace in the hole "AHA! IVE BEEN REVIVED".
For the record, no this didn't affect me Rage, in fact I have more of a stake in you being alive, but bullshit is bullshit and you know it.
Out of game problems, out of game solutions.
Avu wrote:Since my previous "subtle" thread got moved to hell by the goon moderator who pretended ignorance regarding the topic I will come out and do it the obvious way this time. So again since when did the devs start doing char resurrections? Known bugs like wall jumping never got anyone resurrected before and arguably those should merit revival why start making an exception now for Rage.
Potjeh wrote:Yeah, it's not so much a problem with him being alive, as it a problem with the rest of us having to start over when we die. If this was Random McNoob rather than a high end jeweller, an important character owned by a well-known player, would he be rezzed? I think not.
Potjeh wrote:For the record, if my account was stolen via a custom client I wouldn't expect the devs to do anything. Using custom clients is a risk you take willingly, and if it turns out bad you only have yourself to blame. The only hacking that calls for dev intervention would be if the server itself got hacked.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 4 guests