Peter wrote:Um... I did just explain how this could be solved pretty easily
sabinati wrote:what if i want to loiter on the bridge? or block people's passage unless they pay a toll? or hide under it and ambush their merchant caravan? really do you think making it a warp gate is actually better than making an object that can be walked on and boated or swam under?
Peter wrote:That's his point- he wants to be able to loiter on the bridge.
Jfloyd wrote:Peter wrote:That's his point- he wants to be able to loiter on the bridge.
That has no validity in my eyes, it just means he's wanting to be an ass.
theTrav wrote:Jfloyd wrote:Peter wrote:That's his point- he wants to be able to loiter on the bridge.
That has no validity in my eyes, it just means he's wanting to be an ass.
Wait, so you're deciding what is and is not a valid use of bridges now?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 28 guests