Why cant we have normal LP gain as well as curiosities? instead of the endless debates over which is better?'
just an idea.
i am suggesting this thread as a debate towards achieving or dismissing the above goal.
User was warned for this post.
-
bmjclark
- Posts: 4053
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 6:40 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Lp debate
Cause bots are bad.
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
-
inventer110
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:06 am
Re: Lp debate
bmjclark wrote:Cause bots are bad.
And you can't have a bot to collect curiosities?
I could write a program to search them out in a matter of days.
i am just saying that bots are inevitable and not a good reason for dismissal.
Last edited by inventer110 on Sun Dec 18, 2011 10:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Absolute Power Corrupts, Absolutely."
-
TeckXKnight
- Posts: 8274
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:31 am
- Location: How Do I?
Re: Lp debate
What debate? So far it's one side going "MY EMPIRICAL KNOWLEDGE IS MORE RIGHT THAN YOURS!" and the other side saying "THIS EXACT SAME RETARDED POST HAS BEEN MADE A THOUSAND TIMES BEFORE WHY ARE YOU POSTING IT AGAIN?" I'm not even trying to discourage you here this is just what every single thread breaks down to. There has never been a good argument for why you should bring back LP via actions. I don't care if you're eloquent or not just bring facts to the table rather than nothing at all.
tl;dr lol wut debate?
tl;dr lol wut debate?
-
bmjclark
- Posts: 4053
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 6:40 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Lp debate
At least they would get killed by people on mindless killing sprees such as myself. You can't sit in ur town and dig up bluebellsinventer110 wrote:bmjclark wrote:Cause bots are bad.
And you can't have a bot to collect curiosities?
I could write a program to search them out in a matter of days.
i am just saying that bots are inevitable and not a good reason for dismissal.
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
-
inventer110
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:06 am
Re: Lp debate
TeckXKnight wrote:What debate? So far it's one side going "MY EMPIRICAL KNOWLEDGE IS MORE RIGHT THAN YOURS!" and the other side saying "THIS EXACT SAME RETARDED POST HAS BEEN MADE A THOUSAND TIMES BEFORE WHY ARE YOU POSTING IT AGAIN?" I'm not even trying to discourage you here this is just what every single thread breaks down to. There has never been a good argument for why you should bring back LP via actions. I don't care if you're eloquent or not just bring facts to the table rather than nothing at all.
tl;dr lol wut debate?
If you don't wish for healthy debate it wont cause me any harm, its your choice.
"Absolute Power Corrupts, Absolutely."
-
inventer110
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:06 am
Re: Lp debate
people in villages can be killed it just takes a little more effort.bmjclark wrote:At least they would get killed by people on mindless killing sprees such as myself. You can't sit in ur town and dig up bluebellsinventer110 wrote:bmjclark wrote:Cause bots are bad.
And you can't have a bot to collect curiosities?
I could write a program to search them out in a matter of days.
i am just saying that bots are inevitable and not a good reason for dismissal.
and whats to stop someone from writing a combat macro to counter act killing?
Last edited by inventer110 on Sun Dec 18, 2011 10:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Absolute Power Corrupts, Absolutely."
-
bmjclark
- Posts: 4053
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 6:40 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Lp debate
If by a little more effort you mean an uphill battle with a broken impossible to ram a town siege system then i agree with you.
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
-
inventer110
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:06 am
Re: Lp debate
if i am correct you can shoot over walls right? or did they remove that ability.bmjclark wrote:If by a little more effort you mean an uphill battle with a broken impossible to ram a town siege system then i agree with you.
"Absolute Power Corrupts, Absolutely."
-
TeckXKnight
- Posts: 8274
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:31 am
- Location: How Do I?
Re: Lp debate
That's not a fair comparison to make. That's like saying it's as simple to build a hermitage as it is to build a global trade hub.inventer110 wrote:people in villages can be killed it just takes a little more effort.
and whats to stop someone from writing a combat macro to counter act killing?
