Stone Sack.

pawnking2 · Post by **pawnking2** » Wed Apr 25, 2012 8:26 pm

I was thinking, Im hunting with my sling and I have to carry stones around in my inventory. It takes up space for when your having to overhaul meat and stuff back to the village. I had the idea of you guys creating a stone sack. It can carry up to 100 stones, and it is held in the hand. It only takes 1 peice of harden leather (for carrying that much weight of the stones) and 10 string. It would help during huinting and if you are using a sling... well... you have your backpack for the arrows. If yopu guys would plesae make this or make something like it, please do it ASAP.

Thx for reading this, signed,
Pawnking2

Neon14 · Post by **Neon14** » Wed Apr 25, 2012 8:40 pm

pawnking2 wrote:I was thinking, Im hunting with my sling and I have to carry stones around in my inventory. It takes up space for when your having to overhaul meat and stuff back to the village. I had the idea of you guys creating a stone sack. It can carry up to 100 stones, and it is held in the hand. It only takes 1 peice of harden leather (for carrying that much weight of the stones) and 10 string. It would help during huinting and if you are using a sling... well... you have your backpack for the arrows. If yopu guys would plesae make this or make something like it, please do it ASAP.

Thx for reading this, signed,
Pawnking2

Eventually you just stop using sling altogether, at least that's me, but I support this idea for those that do use it.

Do remember killing bears with a sling, having to constantly go pick at some rock until I got my bags full, fire them off, go back, it'd make sense. I also suggest teleporting back with the animal instead of butchering it then and there, saves room.

pawnking2 · Post by **pawnking2** » Wed Apr 25, 2012 8:42 pm

I'm having to carry multiple animals back and i need to butcher a few to carry the meat back. So thats it for the butchering. I use the sling cause its easier to kill things with it and its easier to have a higher Q than a bow.

Post by **MagicManICT** » Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:47 am

I've never quit using a sling to hunt. They eventually get good enough to one-shot a fox and even boars.

Neon14 · Post by **Neon14** » Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:20 am

Well, this is the reason why I -don't- use the sling, rocks take up too much space...

Still useless in my opinion later on, foxes you can close combat down in less than 15 seconds, boars a little more but the same idea. Ineffecient for hunting only for above reason (stones) which is why this stone sack is a good idea..

borka · Post by **borka** » Thu Apr 26, 2012 10:08 pm

i never used slings till W5 (only bows) - since W5 sling, sack and milestone signs are my fave

Dolby3d · Post by **Dolby3d** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:56 am

This has been mentioned before so please use the search function before you start a new thread.
Reason why it won't get implemented is because it will be used for paving instead of ammo.

HarryDresden · Post by **HarryDresden** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:05 am

Dolby3d wrote:This has been mentioned before so please use the search function before you start a new thread.
Reason why it won't get implemented is because it will be used for paving instead of ammo.

And the problem is?

fanit937 · Post by **fanit937** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:09 am

[insert anything here] sack.

No.

Dolby3d · Post by **Dolby3d** » Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:28 am

HarryDresden wrote:
Dolby3d wrote:This has been mentioned before so please use the search function before you start a new thread.
Reason why it won't get implemented is because it will be used for paving instead of ammo.
And the problem is?

exploitation of the "stone sack" perhaps? it wont be used for ammo that's for sure so this suggestion willnever make it

Stone Sack.

Stone Sack.

Re: Stone Sack.

Re: Stone Sack.

Re: Stone Sack.

Re: Stone Sack.

Re: Stone Sack.

Re: Stone Sack.

Re: Stone Sack.

Re: Stone Sack.

Re: Stone Sack.