Trappin wrote:Crib;
a small theft
plagiarism
All the primary original source material contained in the Bloomberg article.
Shall I post the defenitions of "source" "primary" "original" and what those words mean when "conjoined" and placed in a "proper" sentence? Because I really dont feel like wet nursing a "churl" when having an "adult" conversation.
I've literally never heard anyone use that word before, holy christ relax man.
I still don't know what you're specifically calling plagarism, everything that's said in that article about the Spanish Flu strikes me as something that the book you're referring to did not invent. 80% of that article is quotes that people have said and the other 20% is things like "it happened in three waves" and "the first wasn't as deadly as the other two." To call any of that plagiarism when that's common knowledge is pretty dubious. Unless you're talking about something else the Bloomberg article says, in which case please point that out because I'm not seeing it.
If those quotes are from that book, the article does not need to cite the book's quotes. They're attributing the quotes to those who said them directly and that's totally fine.