Jalpha wrote:I am not quite sure what you mean by that. Are you implying that the current increase in cases may actually be seasonal flu cases which have been mislabelled?
This would not surprise me, there are hints that normal corona virus variants have been reported as SARS-COV-2 by laboratories
https://web.archive.org/web/20200504012 ... oronavirus (translated to english using google translate)
03.04.2020
Changed layout of findings for SARS-CoV2 PCR results
From now on we only output the results positively or negatively on our findings.
So far you have received two results depending on the test used.
If the sample was analyzed using the Roche method, we have given the measurement results for both target sequences of the PCR (ORF1 and E genes) separately. The ORF1 gene is specific for SARS-CoV-2, while the E gene is also found in other corona viruses. We have already rated the cases in which only the ORF gene was amplified as positive. Few cases with an isolated positive E gene were classified as questionable and therefore repeatedly led to questions and problems regarding the further management of affected patients. Taking into account the epidemiological situation and the overall increased positive rate, we are now following the WHO recommendation and will issue a result as "positive" if only the E gene has been amplified. To simplify the finding, only an overall result (positive or negative) will appear in the future. A result is positive if at least one of the two target sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in the smear material.
If the sample was analyzed using methods from rBiopharm or TibMolbiol, we have previously carried out separate screening and confirmation tests. Analogous to the procedure described above, we restrict ourselves to the previous screening test, which targets the E gene, due to the high positive predictive value with increasing COVID-19 prevalence.
This laboratory basically stated that '
any coronavirus found will from now on be reported
as SARS-COV-2 had been found as the WHO requested it to be done like this'. Your guess for why the WHO could be interested in generating false positives for what will be reported as 'coronavirus infections'... is as good as mine.
Because for the most part it has been limited to one state in Australia and has then spread from there.
Given the above: Do all areas use the same PCR test?
The death rate seems higher than an ordinary flu, at around 1.5% by my rough estimation, maybe even lower.
What death rate? Cases, IFR, mortality?
As strain on healthcare facilities increases though it is looking like that rate may increase. In any case I suppose more data will become available in the coming months.
I hope that your country will fare better at information gathering, in the sense of your leading institutions
not actively trying to suppress knowledge gains as happened here in Germany .
You might find
https://swprs.org/a-swiss-doctor-on-covid-19/ an interesting read, that page contains links to the sources of nearly all that is stated (instead of simply claiming something, without any proof but just endless repetition till the recipients believe it as truth).