From some random health website that was the top listing of Google when searching for "airborne disease":
Airborne disease can spread when people with certain infections cough, sneeze, or talk, spewing nasal and throat secretions into the air. Some viruses or bacteria take flight and hang in the air or land on other people or surfaces.
I'm not sure if that's a medical definition or not, and not going to dig to find out specifics. I can say that there are two types of airborne diseases, whether virus or other--those that can survive 'dry' and those that require moisture. The former, dry, means that even if the vector that spread them, a cough or sneeze, even talking, the disease-causing agent continues to live. Wet viruses, sars-cov-type II being one, require moisture to survive. They'll linger in the air for at least several minutes even in the driest of environments. They can linger in the air for hours in very humid environments. I think I saw upwards of six or eight hours on one study (the study I posted many pages ago).
The CDC said 'not an airborne virus' back in January or February... like most everything in science that wasn't proven fact*... It's just a theory. It could be wrong. TBH, the scientific method is grade school level science... that so many people in this world graduate college and still not understand it just amazes me. Not to change subjects, but the theory of evolution is just that--a theory that is founded in rigorous logic. It could damn well be wrong and The Holy Bible be the absolute truth... but there's not logical reasoning there, just stories handed down over generations, so we can't accept it... Everyone took Newton to be "the law" on gravity... yet he was absolutely wrong, and it took almost 300 years to prove it. (Took that long to further develop the math to explain general relativity, I guess?) Everyone thought the Earth was flat (except some Ancient Greeks, a handful of "heretics," etc etc etc) until it became accepted that it wasn't.
Zentetsuken wrote:you are just trolling.
Even trolls can contribute to the discussion and keep it lively. Just don't succumb to reacting stupidly to the trolls and keep it "professional & courteous."
"Yes, there are going to be profiteers with any major news cycle, whether it be an outbreak of disease or a massive killing spree. This is one of the major flaws of capitalism." I'm not sure anything other than that statement has anything to do with this current issue.
ARTE is a French/German highbrow TV-channel. Because of its small, elite viewership, it can allow itself to commission daring documentaries that would never see the light of day in media with broader audiences.
Means you had best double check everything they present because if it doesn't meet the standards to make it into peer-reviewed journals, or if it doesn't meet the standards to get circulated by the larger news organizations, there are likely flaws in their methods. It doesn't make them wrong, just unverified. (then again, how many times has one major media service sent out a story to later be redacted only after everyone else picked up on it and parroted it for days?) If you're going to be skeptical of the "big guys" in news and, well, everywhere, then be even more skeptical of the little guys that are much more easily going to prey on those that not trust others easily. At least the big guys have the eyes of the world on them, and in a free society, anyone can speak out and present facts to prove them wrong.
*I've been accused by many of not being "precise enough" in my manner of speaking and writing. I'm just used to discussions with egg-head scientists and logicians where it's easy to just pass over bits and pieces for efficiency in communicating. Everything a person states is a working theory, postulate, or otherwise "your opinion" unless it has been proven otherwise. When you communicate with your peers this way frequently, it's easy to forget to communicate with others outside your circle... and then again, maybe they just got stuck in their own hubris and spoke too quickly out of authority.
Opinions expressed in this statement are the authors alone and in no way reflect on the game development values of the actual developers.