Robben_DuMarsch wrote:
Isn't it more manly to have sex with women without entering into a government enforceable contract that entitles them to our financial support, though?
The institution of marriage is pretty insecure, and largely favors the less fit and lower value men that need societal pressure to attract partners.
Look at this cope, those aren't the actual dynamics at play here and you know it.
Societal pressures will always dictate who mates and who doesn't. What are you talking about? Caveman times? Africa?
"Favors the less fit and lower value men"... MAYBE It does if partners are hard to find (i.e. living as a pioneer family in a desolate wilderness) and you want your children to breed/you need labor to survive/dowry (see: arranged marriages); but today marriage is intended to facilitate nuclear families, which are essential for raising successful children.
Also, your definition and my definition of "manly" must be different: Going around having sex with multiple people just to get your rocks off isn't "manly" at all... what the fuck are you? An animal? Do you also like to stick twigs up your ass for fun because it feels good, like chimps at the zoo do?
If you really are "manly" your wife will not only want to stay faithful to you, but also to *follow* you since she finds security and stability in being with you. Remember: women have the minds of children.
Also, "government enforceable contract" is quite the broad statement.
lmao just stfu you pseudo-intellectual retard