wolf1000wolf wrote:Austinh15 wrote:wolf1000wolf wrote:The problem with misa's detractors is people keep misusing words like "pedophile" and "rape".
Pedophilia is sexual attraction towards prepubescent children.
Rape is non-consensual sexual assault. Wikipedia describes it as " The act may be carried out by physical force, coercion, abuse of authority, or against a person who is incapable of giving valid consent, such as one who is unconscious, incapacitated, has an intellectual disability, or is below the legal age of consent (statutory rape)."
Misa engaged in neither of these acts unless we know the 15 year old was drunk/unconscious.
Sure, most people would consider a 22 year old having sex with a 15 year old morally problematic but extreme hyperbole doesn't help your argument.
Age of consent is technically 14 in brazil, however the idea of age of consent is to identify when a person is able to consent right? If they can't consent due to age, then what would you call it?
Of course, the argument here is also that 14 is way too low for an actively developing child.
You're one of the few people here being rationale and not just resorting to personal attacks out of moral outrage.
I assume you mean "can't consent due to age" to mean a 15 year old isn't mentally developed enough to make decisions about having sex?
To a degree yes, but it's also to prevent people older/more mature people than them to groom them into those actions. This is a law of protection not an auction house.
See's a horse that is looking a little raw relentlessly being beaten, and ignores it before asking, hi, how are you doing pedo gang?
