Cajoes wrote:To clarify my stance, I am not arguing for or against a revival of the character. Characters are transient assets at best.
I am merely pointing out that precedence based laws are hugely unhelpful when the precedence are as muddled as W1-9 are. Especially considering everyone seems to include the long stretches of time of W6-7 where the devs were unable to arbitrate simply because they did not have the time, as precedence. (Seeing how they were finishing up SALEM/Hafen2.0)
Thats a very good point and its true. Also this is an Alpha. A payed one.
Cajoes wrote:Basicly: Each case should be judged by its own merits and situation.
True, but acording to what. To a rule? To the judge mood? To the judge infinite wisdom?
Justice and fairnes arent equal to legal.
Cajoes wrote:Also while I do not argue for reviving Bob the Barbarian. As it stands now, all of his account/stead assets are effectively frozen because someone figured out that you can ignore a intended mechanic by humping a horse and a ropewalk while on a friendly vclaim at the same time*, which is ridiculous. - I would however like to suggest the devs merely smash the hijacked gates. This would not violate the No-Ressurection rule and still undo a major amount of the damage. But that is just my own humble opinion. I simply think the situation sucks that Bob died to '
secret murder' rather than yannow, a arrow to the knee or a 1v1.
I dont really get this part. But if you mean that Bob should have died as a warrior I agree. This is why i hate bug or mechanic abusers. Laws arent stones anyway, so if you are suggesting finding a rational way to use one or another meaning or possible meaning of a law, i agree with you. Anyway, Devs are the law and they can do whatever they want.
Cajoes wrote:*this is a facetious statement meant to illustrate the absurdity of the situation, I will not confirm nor deny that this is how the bug/exploit happened and as a result, you may not use it in a counter-argument. Even partially and/or out of context.
ok.
I do agree however than you and Nooby and other people are right when they say that Bob has died against cowards and people who have probably demonstrated that they arent capable of beat him in a fair and leggit fight. Whoever did this is a first grade pussy and I hope they get rekt for it.
Anyway, after Tartarus affair and devs answer there is just a logic result for this:
Now devs should say, after showing the perpetrators, that bugabusing and mechanic abusing should be legal against them. If its the same case, of course. And my opinion is that, in a major or lesser grade, its something quite similar. Lets see what happens.
Also I want to invite you all to this thread. I think that if this particular point is changed things like Tartarus would have been avoided.
viewtopic.php?f=48&t=48143Edit= Also I must add that I'm pretty sure Devs wont rise a finger against theyr favourite pet. If its him behind this, of course.
Last edited by pedorlee on Tue Mar 29, 2016 2:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.