Azkanan wrote:
Edit;
Wait, you guys have been escalating from debate to personal insults, over the course of 6 pages, over a reset of a game world? =|...
You can say you're for the reset. You can say you're against the reset. But what you can't say, is what other people should say.
You can make a case about your point, but trying to forcibly change somebody's mind is what causes a 6-page threadcrash.
burgingham wrote:Gotrek did a shitton of work there to supply people with farm stuff etc. You murder him despite knowing who he was. Why not assasinate the 2 people who insulted you and then get out? It would have proven your point much better and also proven you really do understand how to fight people and not only how to slaughter helpless sheep.
Gauteamus wrote:Ultimately it would be fun to have a reset mechanism inbuilt in the game rules.
Once we have seasons, the Ragnarök would be herolded by three Fimbul winters of increasing harshness, with civilization struggling to survive, and the noobs freezing to icicles by the hundreds out in the forests. A time for axes and broken shields, a time for wolves and ravens - brother turning on brother.
Then, when the ruthless and the meek starve alike, the survivors of the winter has to face the Jötunn Surt, Fenrisulfr and Jörmungandr, and Hel shows to be more than a subforum after all.
Unless through some miraculous feat of cooperation, strength and divine intervention, the forces of Hel are defeated, the world will sink into the seas, engulfed in flames.
Fortunately, the gods can simply run a new mapgen, with the virgin world being woven infront of the astonished eyes of the now in spirit only hearthlings.
Accompanied by some Richard Strauss.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Google [Bot] and 4 guests