Another comparison for you
http://i.imgur.com/d7XSYjq.png
http://i.imgur.com/dginyCQ.png
Jackard wrote:Amanda44 wrote:Yes, but how is it any better all bunched up? It doesn't alter the wall of text, it just lengthens it down-wise, it will take up the whole page!
So you're telling me that you read each line of the original, then compared it to the reduced length and didn't find the fix less eye-straining or easier to follow?
Or is this still conjecture.
ArvinJA wrote:Amanda44 wrote:Yes, but how is it any better all bunched up? It doesn't alter the wall of text, it just lengthens it down-wise, it will take up the whole page! I can't see how it helps to have shorter lines, really, I'm not just being argumentative.
It's hard for the eye to go from line n to line n+1 if lines are too long. If there's only one or two lines, it'll still be easy (most short posts are of that length). However, when someone decides to post a full-length novel, it becomes way more straining.
Basically the idea is to reduce the eye strain per line switch, so that, regardless of the amount of lines in total, it will still be fairly easy to read.
Jackard wrote:Another comparison for you
http://i.imgur.com/d7XSYjq.png
http://i.imgur.com/dginyCQ.png
Jackard wrote:Dare I ask for mobile-friendly forums ??
@-moz-document domain("havenandhearth.com"), domain("www.havenandhearth.com") {
body {
background: url(http://bgfons.com/upload/grass_texture598.jpg)no-repeat center top fixed!important;
background-size:100%!important;
}
.navbar {
background: url(http://i.imgur.com/P27aC5T.png) repeat scroll 0% 0% transparent;
border-width: thin;
border-style: solid;
border-color: #FFF #888 #888 #FFF;
}
.content {
width: 580px;
font-size: 14px !important;
overflow: visible !important;
}
#page-body, #page-header, #page-footer {
width: 800px;
margin: auto !important;
}
video, .attachbox, .attachbox img, img {
max-width: 100% !important;
height: auto !important;
}
.content img, .content video {
max-width: 530px !important;
}
.content blockquote img {
max-width: 100% !important;
height: auto !important;
}
.postlink {
color: #225588 !important;
}
}
Avulsio wrote:Thanks for the head start, Arvin. Here's an update to your userstyle:
http://i.imgur.com/tWc3n0r.png
- Code: Select all
@-moz-document domain("havenandhearth.com"), domain("www.havenandhearth.com") {
body {
background: url(http://bgfons.com/upload/grass_texture598.jpg)no-repeat center top fixed!important;
background-size:100%!important;
}
.navbar {
background: url(http://i.imgur.com/P27aC5T.png) repeat scroll 0% 0% transparent;
border-width: thin;
border-style: solid;
border-color: #FFF #888 #888 #FFF;
}
.content {
width: 580px;
font-size: 14px !important;
overflow: visible !important;
}
#page-body, #page-header, #page-footer {
width: 800px;
margin: auto !important;
}
video, .attachbox, .attachbox img, img {
max-width: 100% !important;
height: auto !important;
}
.content img, .content video {
max-width: 530px !important;
}
.content blockquote img {
max-width: 100% !important;
height: auto !important;
}
.postlink {
color: #225588 !important;
}
}
Avulsio wrote:
- Code: Select all
background: [...] fixed;
Avulsio wrote:Thanks for the head start, Arvin. Here's an update to your userstyle:
Avulsio wrote:Thanks for the head start, Arvin. Here's an update to your userstyle
- Code: Select all
css
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 2 guests