
Avarice wrote:The lag is exactly the same for me as it was pre-hd replacement...which is to say unplayable.
tempwad wrote:loftar wrote:tempwad wrote:recvmsg() is posix, and it gives destination address.
No, it gives the source address, not the destination address. ;)
no, mate, it gives both.
https://groups.google.com/group/comp.os ... 278c7e6fe1
GreenScape wrote:If you really mean _destination_ then yeah. But that only make's sense for when you have more than one network interface.
Dill wrote:Avarice wrote:The lag is exactly the same for me as it was pre-hd replacement...which is to say unplayable.
Avarice dont know what he be talking bout
The lag has lifted a bit for me. Not as much since before the hd replacement.
Still laggy but not as much lag now
loftar wrote:blabla about posix...
tempwad wrote:do you understand, what your method of reliable delivery messages over UDP is the worst method in the world?
i mean - spamming packet until peer ack.
loftar wrote:tempwad wrote:do you understand, what your method of reliable delivery messages over UDP is the worst method in the world?
i mean - spamming packet until peer ack.
If you are implying that there is a better way to handle packet loss than retransmission, then do feel free to educate me and the rest of the networking world.
Otherwise, I think you would instead want to elaborate upon the specifics of my retransmission scheme.
painhertz wrote:But in all seriousness please tell me that this is something that can be fixed "prior" to the release of Salem
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 5 guests