Jackard wrote:just to reiterate, this discussion is entitled to you not shouting down or running off other participants
Lunarius_Haberdash wrote:Repercussionist wrote:Lunarius_Haberdash wrote:It is a game, this is true, she is not entitled to have fun. That implies the game was written for her, and it was not. It was written by Jorb and Loftar, to be what they want it to be.
Not to be rude, but you've written countless pages on what should and shouldn't be a part of the game, only to say "but it's Jorb and Loftar's to do what they want anyway" when someone voices a different opinion? Then why would you spend so much effort arguing about how the game should be? What would you do if their vision of the game turns out to not be what you envision it to be? I would almost go as far to say that you wouldn't follow your own "advice". You seem to have strong convictions on what is right for haven and that somehow J/L is obviously going to implement it because it's obviously the way to go.
Maybe they want a game set in the iron age where flying monkeys are the dominant intellectual race and they hunt you down with spacey lazer guns.
I have never implied that I was entitled to anything, or that they owed me anything, however. Suggestions, opinions, are one thing. Stating that they owe me something is another.
That's the key.. "I think it should be this way" is a far cry from "I am entitled to."
If it's not that way, I'll play it the way they make it. They don't owe me shit.
Jackard wrote:Maybe some deserve that, but probably not ones in the Announcements forum!
Avulsio wrote:Though I agree with the idea that you could teleport to hearthfire only if your pack is empty.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 5 guests