Arcan2 wrote:But whatever, see you in a week. I'll be sure to post something extra special for you teck
If he hadn't I doubt there would be any further comments, well, at least I wouldn't have commented anyway.

Arcan2 wrote:But whatever, see you in a week. I'll be sure to post something extra special for you teck
ramones wrote:Is really that gif considered that much offensive? Personally i find a lot of pictures on forum much much more disturbing that this censored one which I found it as a funny joke (though it could be put up in other context, didn't see the post itself). On other hand I agree there shouldn't be such harsh reactions, they're never good.
TeckXKnight wrote:A disturbing image was posted and removed by a mod, me in this instance. In response you post another disturbing image that purposefully looks like a dog fellating a dude as if this is somehow appropriate. You can play cute and try to skirt whatever line you want, but those kinds of images are highly inappropriate here. If you wish to push the issue the result will be the same and I hope that you don't.
6. Sass[/size]
Any concerns regarding a moderated post or thread should be taken to the moderation discussion. Do not derail threads with posts discussing moderator actions.
TeckXKnight wrote:The original gif removed was of a frog that had been cut open and prepared that was still frantically squirming and writhing on someone's food plate.
Amanda44 wrote:TeckXKnight wrote:The original gif removed was of a frog that had been cut open and prepared that was still frantically squirming and writhing on someone's food plate.
That is sooo awful, I wish you hadn't said Teck.
Amanda44 wrote:[incoherent baww]
Dzedajus wrote:Amanda44 wrote:[incoherent baww]
Quick, call the cyberpolice and plug off the router!
factnfiction101 wrote:^I agree with this guy.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 1 guest