Papa_bear wrote:Karel7766 wrote:im not and i wont be
HAPPY WITH ITNOT LIKING IT
Shut The FUCK UP BITCH!!
Quit Whining!
Internets is serious business.
Papa_bear wrote:Karel7766 wrote:im not and i wont be
HAPPY WITH ITNOT LIKING IT
Shut The FUCK UP BITCH!!
Quit Whining!
kazgar wrote:is this reset today, or next week?
Jackard wrote:and giving even that much warning wasnt a good idea
Jackard wrote:"two" is much more specific than "couple of" which is a vague term similar to "a few"
and giving even that much warning wasnt a good idea, didnt you guys learn anything from the last time
Jackard wrote:"two" is much more specific than "couple of" which is a vague term similar to "a few"
jorb wrote:Then mankind would have become as the Great Old Ones; free and wild and beyond good and evil, with laws and morals thrown aside and all men shouting and killing and revelling in joy. Then the liberated Old Ones would teach them new ways to shout and kill and revel and enjoy themselves, and all the earth would flame with a holocaust of ecstasy and freedom.
Chakravanti wrote:Jackard wrote:"two" is much more specific than "couple of" which is a vague term similar to "a few"
"couple" means two. It is very specific. That it is ever used to mean anything else is a misnomer. IF anything it is more similar to 'pair' than 'two' because it has an intrinsic denotation of joining even though its use often discards such connotations.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 1 guest