A Plea for Moderation

Announcements about major changes in Haven & Hearth.

Re: A Plea for Moderation

Postby LoW2 » Thu Mar 27, 2014 9:13 pm

Patchouli_Knowledge wrote:
LoW2 wrote:
Dzedajus wrote:you shouldn't get mad over forum bans like that, but look at the bright side the forum will have less retarded posts.

They were retarded before I joined.


Which doesn't justifies making it worse.

In some ways yes. Sorry. Or at least for the bits that were not funny.

@Am
>Deserved insults (all truth)
>NO COMMENT as per dze

@ahh dze thats almost kind
I prefer comparisons to Stalin who was arguably worse than hitler. When you invoke hitler its full retard mode. You are better than that. I'm not going to get along with people I fucking hate. And its not baseless hate. There are good reasons. You seem to be one of the sanest people here dze, *fistbump*. Thank you

Obligatory:
Image
Last edited by LoW2 on Thu Mar 27, 2014 9:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
LoW2
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 12:38 am

Re: A Plea for Moderation

Postby snoog » Thu Mar 27, 2014 9:17 pm

lesson learned (again):
never discuss with idiots. are a lot. (yes its for ninijutsu, dze, sabinati, jc, amanda, write any nick here, and probably can be aceptable :) )
snoog
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: A Plea for Moderation

Postby Ninijutsu » Thu Mar 27, 2014 9:20 pm

snoog wrote:lesson learned (again):
never discuss with idiots. are a lot.


While you're banned, go take an english class please. You should have been dispelled from the forum a long time ago for not posting in the forum language, only half of your posts are capable of being interpreted, and even those are hardly coherent.
Of another era.
User avatar
Ninijutsu
 
Posts: 2225
Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 4:22 am

Re: A Plea for Moderation

Postby jordancoles » Thu Mar 27, 2014 9:44 pm

sabinati wrote:
LoW2 wrote:Yes evasion, but I feel I need to respond to this crap.


while one is technically allowed to post in this thread with an alt while one's main account is banned, it is really only allowable for the purpose of discussing the issue of the ban, not continuing your dumb argument.

So what's up with this then?

LoW2 wrote:Yes evasion, but I feel I need to respond to this crap.

The right to respond to discussion was lost when the ban was issued.

snoog wrote:@Vaku, is nice from you, show to other guys in this forums your point of view, I share the same opinion, I never stop to call fags to fags, bitchs to bitchs, man to mans, friends to friends, the reality is we (everyone) uses adjetive to the people who think can use. the mods are gods here, and i no feel scary to write mi opinion to everyone here, include this 'gods'

@Amanda : usually I ignore you, but now i gonna write this : Go to fuck yourself. you are so idiot... bitching in ever fucking post when someone reply to JC; not just me, i meaning TO ALL, so SHUT THE FUCK UP, dont worry to write me, I no read you.

@Sabi. Im not a native speaker, but now i confirme this : u need be less idiot and learn to read. ( i write very neutral)

Very little to do with the ban and more to do with defiance of forum rules.

I never stop to call fags to fags, bitchs to bitchs

The exact reason for the ban in the first place.

@Amanda : usually I ignore you, but now i gonna write this : Go to fuck yourself. you are so idiot... bitching in ever fucking post when someone reply to JC; not just me, i meaning TO ALL, so SHUT THE FUCK UP, dont worry to write me, I no read you.

Nothing to do with the ban, continued overly abusive language with no signs of stopping.
Duhhrail wrote:No matter how fast you think you can beat your meat, Jordancoles lies in the shadows and waits to attack his defenseless prey. (tl;dr) Don't afk and jack off. :lol:

Check out my pro-tips thread
Image Image Image
User avatar
jordancoles
 
Posts: 14076
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 6:50 pm
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Re: A Plea for Moderation

Postby jordancoles » Thu Mar 27, 2014 9:48 pm

Also why can't I report posts in the plea for moderation thread yet?
Duhhrail wrote:No matter how fast you think you can beat your meat, Jordancoles lies in the shadows and waits to attack his defenseless prey. (tl;dr) Don't afk and jack off. :lol:

Check out my pro-tips thread
Image Image Image
User avatar
jordancoles
 
Posts: 14076
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 6:50 pm
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Re: A Plea for Moderation

Postby sabinati » Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:03 pm

only the pure of heart may do so
User avatar
sabinati
 
Posts: 15513
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
Location: View active topics

Re: A Plea for Moderation

Postby LoW2 » Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:06 pm

Am I pure sabi? :p
LoW2
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 12:38 am

Re: A Plea for Moderation

Postby Vaku » Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:22 pm

Tracing my accusation of hypocrisy requires acknowledging the rulebreak.

sabinati writes in both cases, respective of time:
Reason: if you don't want people to read or respond to your posts, don't write them.

Reason: shitposting constantly


Note the lack of citation to the rules which sabinati himself published. Does this not show enough the prevalence that there lacks a standard to which these punishments are measured?

We must assume that indeed, sabinati was acting on a rulebreak, otherwise the bans, particularly the ban of Lord_of_War, are being made with no sound accord, and are worse than hypocritical, they are groundless and should be lifted.

Before going further with Lord_of_War's ban, we should first establish if sabinati banned Lord_of_War from this page viewtopic.php?f=6&t=32976&start=350#p473171 to this page viewtopic.php?f=6&t=32976&start=360 ,in that instance—with ample reason.

Windmaker's case rests on the fact that we have no standard. Mockery, as shown by sabinati and ChildhoodObesity, feeding on Arcanist's posting, without this standard, constitutes just as well as shitposting / derailment / spam, which is what some might view as bannable. Indeed the rules as published by sabinati show them to be spam.
sabinati wrote:The forum is not your blog! Threads not even remotely related to the game may be moderated!


To retain sabinati's, ChildhoodObesity's, and Arcanist's skirting offenses, is to suggest that windmaker too skirts the line, and warrants no ban, especially when there lacks a standard for foul language and offense, when windmaker himself, per Arcanist's evidence, shows he does not use the word "fag" as it has been conceived to mean in Jordan Coles' appeal for a ban.

I again make my plea, that the bans either be reduced or become enforced with a clear standard (hell, I'll even help to rewrite the rules, provide graphics and crap so everyone is clear of do's and don't's).
Image Smell of Arrogance
Vaku
 
Posts: 427
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 7:03 am

Re: A Plea for Moderation

Postby czaper2 » Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:28 pm

I'll just drop this here.

jorb wrote:If anyone wishes to lodge a complaint with the mods' excercise of power, please send me or loftar a PM.
User avatar
czaper2
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2013 12:48 pm

Re: A Plea for Moderation

Postby Amanda44 » Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:29 pm

Vaku wrote:
when windmaker himself, per Arcanist's evidence, shows he does not use the word "fag" as it has been conceived to mean in Jordan Coles' appeal for a ban.



viewtopic.php?f=7&t=22724&p=470919#p470919

Ok.
Koru wrote:
It is like in Lord of the Flies, nobody controlls what is going on in the hearthlands, those weaker and with conscience are just fucked.
Avatar made by Jordan.
Animal lovers - Show us your pets! - viewtopic.php?f=40&t=44444#p577254
User avatar
Amanda44
 
Posts: 6485
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:13 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Announcements

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 1 guest