LoW2 wrote:Are you afraid they would be too good and fair?
LoW2 wrote:Do tell us stories of these fabled salem forums.
Tonkyhonk wrote:*edit*
this is my own plea for moderation to extend LoW's ban and not an attempt to talk to him, except for the added "p.s." part.
LoW2 wrote:Turns out there is a rather more in depth etymology.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faggot
https://translate.google.com/?hl=en&tab ... ric%C3%B3n
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fagot
earlier and dialect, contemptuous word for a woman or child, probably from fagot
First Known Use: 1914
Middle English fagot, from Anglo-French
First Known Use: 14th century
Did not take on sexual connotation until later. Windmaker will have to explain more how it is in spanish. More research is required.
snoog wrote:and.. is more interesting write it in this thread, the mod abuse is present in a lot of cases in this forum. the mods cant deal with it but this time sab and teck, are 100% wrong, nobody knows why exactly we are banned,
because say fag a lot of times?
because write bullshit/shitpost?
because write a understandable opinon?
because the ego of JC need be feeded more?
because amanda discover the word "fag" today?
because the act of 12 years of ninijutsu/kaios is too much?
because the mods no fuck with a man/woman/both today?
choose random one, and u have a great reason. meanwhile the people who cant deal with other opinions are throwing shits in this thread (yes, im including in that), i like discuss (with civilization) but im gonna repeat two things
1) its hard deal with idiots.
2) dont discuss with idiots, are a lot.
and the most people here are comporting like idiots including mods.
if you dont like the true.. is your problem.
sabinati wrote:don't follow people around the forum and post inane bullshit.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 4 guests