iceheart wrote:I have a question not related to the previous posts. Let's say that an individual is well behaved and does not break any rules nor instigate any problems? However it is discovered that the individual is an alt of a banned account. How does the moderator respond to this discovery?
PS: this has no relations to me as I just want to know.
sabinati wrote:your appeal is denied, the end.
LoW2 wrote:sabinati wrote:your appeal is denied, the end.
All I ask is under what rule. 5 is not specific enough.
Duhhrail wrote:No matter how fast you think you can beat your meat, Jordancoles lies in the shadows and waits to attack his defenseless prey. (tl;dr) Don't afk and jack off.
iceheart wrote:I have a question not related to the previous posts. Let's say that an individual is well behaved and does not break any rules nor instigate any problems? However it is discovered that the individual is an alt of a banned account. How does the moderator respond to this discovery?
PS: this has no relations to me as I just want to know.
LoW2 wrote:ooh. I doubt that.
iceheart wrote:I have a question not related to the previous posts. Let's say that an individual is well behaved and does not break any rules nor instigate any problems? However it is discovered that the individual is an alt of a banned account. How does the moderator respond to this discovery?
PS: this has no relations to me as I just want to know.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 1 guest