by Jackard » Sat Mar 29, 2014 10:34 am
iceheart wrote:I have a question not related to the previous posts. Let's say that an individual is well behaved and does not break any rules nor instigate any problems? However it is discovered that the individual is an alt of a banned account. How does the moderator respond to this discovery?
by Jackard » Sat Mar 29, 2014 10:36 am
jordancoles wrote:Why do you cling to these forums so desperately? You might want to consider a different toilet.
by NOOBY93 » Sat Mar 29, 2014 11:38 am
jordancoles wrote:LoW2 wrote:sabinati wrote:your appeal is denied, the end.
All I ask is under what rule. 5 is not specific enough.
Go outside and kick a ball around or something, this is pretty pathetic now
Why do you cling to these forums so desperately?
You might want to consider a different outlet.
Jalpha wrote:I believe in my interpretation of things.
by Jackard » Sat Mar 29, 2014 6:39 pm
by LoW2 » Mon Mar 31, 2014 12:20 am
by jordancoles » Mon Mar 31, 2014 12:50 am
LoW2 wrote:Cry more.
Duhhrail wrote:No matter how fast you think you can beat your meat, Jordancoles lies in the shadows and waits to attack his defenseless prey. (tl;dr) Don't afk and jack off.
by R713 » Tue Apr 01, 2014 9:41 pm
LoW2 wrote:USER WAS PERMABANNED FOR THIS POST
by Servant_Girl » Thu Apr 03, 2014 11:01 am
by TeckXKnight » Thu Apr 03, 2014 11:18 am
Servant_Girl wrote:I've been falsely banned for not posting a .gif image in the .gif forum, but the image in question was, in fact a .gif.
Yeah it was a bad joke but no rule was broken it started as 'gif' war and now it is 'post "gifs" or die. I posted a "gif" and still died. Whats the deal?
by Arcanist » Thu Apr 03, 2014 11:29 am
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Claude [Bot] and 1 guest
