Serpensio wrote:The only thing Republicans really go over budget on is National Defense.
Sadly not true.
Serpensio wrote:The only thing Republicans really go over budget on is National Defense.
jorb wrote:I quite well understand the implications of cutting welfare budgets. People who have invested in the ponzi scheme get pissed off. Naturally so. Which is why I don't think the government should be running ponzi schemes to begin with.
jorb wrote:Serpensio wrote:The only thing Republicans really go over budget on is National Defense.
Sadly not true.
loftar wrote:ewlol wrote:I don't think you understand the repercussions of cutting welfare budgets.
Old people are going to go bat shit crazy. Private insurance companies will NOT insure them so they have to rely on the government for coverage. So what now? We cut it and then ... ? You tell me.
Indeed. That's one of the many problems of instituting it to begin with; people start to invest in it and rely on it.
loftar wrote:In case it really isn't obvious to you: Obviously, there isn't anyone who actually believes that there shouldn't be good health care for everyone. The real question is how such health care is actually obtained. What reasonable people realize is that it doesn't happen through any action of the government.
loftar wrote:You do appear to need a good trolling.
ewlol wrote:Medical care here is very expensive. Want to know why? Its because people exploit the system.
ewlol wrote:You walk into a hospital and they are required to serve you.
jorb wrote:ewlol wrote:Medical care here is very expensive. Want to know why? Its because people exploit the system.
Is it the system or the people who are to blame for that?
Serpensio wrote:pyrale wrote:Serpensio wrote:keep the government fiscally responsible.
Yeah sure dude, the USA don't have massive debts. And even if they had, none of it would be due to republicans. LoL.
The only thing Republicans really go over budget on is National Defense. Democrats and their Social Programs are what's bankrupting the country.
Also, I said "/More balanced/", not "completely and perfectly balanced"
It would be cool if you didn't completely ignore the effect of this on US economy. It's not like the money is kept unused. It's directly reinjected in economy, and if you want to simply cut it you gotta find a way to make up for it.loftar wrote:Indeed. That's one of the many problems of instituting it to begin with; people start to invest in it and rely on it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests