Yes, linen and terrible food will drive a more robust economy. I'm only arguing that there is a clear (though perhaps, unintentional) ideology in design (not trade) that ignores reciprocity in less and more advanced players. I'm not saying this is all true all the time and it will come into your house at night and touch your bits and pieces, but I am saying that there is an underlying structure in the economy that is inherently unspecialized, and uni-directional.
That's a problem with arguing structure and anecdotes. You're beyond a diffrent rhetorical style, you're arguing a different thing entirely; you're arguing that something happened or is happening, and I won't disagree. People are selling shit. I'm speculating about how the modes of production effect the market and whether it will perpetuate itself to healthier and healthier places, and you're saying "but people are selling things NOW." What am I supposed to do with that?